Printable Version | Subscribe | Add to Favourites
New Topic New Poll New Reply
Author: Subject: i've been summond to court!!!!
omega0684

posted on 17/7/08 at 11:11 AM Reply With Quote
i've been summond to court!!!!

hi there chaps,

i need some advice, i got court speeding in february time for exceeding a 40mph limit, (seriously tho genuine mistake), it was in a works cars, and they new it was me because i logged the car out. i was driving on the A51 tamworth going from lichfield to tamworth. anyway, i got a letter through the post the other day saying that i have to go to staffordshire courts on 2 accounts,

1) failing to give evidence that may lead to the conviction of the driver.

2)exceeding the speed limit of 40 mph

the second one i am fine with but the first im not, they sent me a few forms with exhibit A & B stamped on them, but i have never seen before and im assuming that they were forms that i was supposed to fill in and send back to the staffordshire police. how can they make an allegation on the assumption that you have received these documents? i have had nothing from the police or from the company i used to work for.

where do i stand?

View User's Profile E-Mail User Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
Paul TigerB6

posted on 17/7/08 at 11:17 AM Reply With Quote
Give the court office a ring and explain that it was a works car and you never got anything through prior to this current summons. They will probably ask you to write in confirming what you have said and if you confirm you were the driver i'd imagine they would save the court's time by dealing with it as a fixed penalty notice.
View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
JamJah

posted on 17/7/08 at 11:17 AM Reply With Quote
might be worth arranging an appointment or telephone call with someone from the speeding fines unit of your force. i think legally they have to explain what you are being accused of.

i guess it is that either you didnt declare to the company you had knowledge of being caught (geniuenely could be a mistake but still is like saying i didnt see the speed limit changing ie due care) or that the police had issues finding out who it was who was speeding.





This is personal advise or personal opinion.
Constructive comments gratefully recieved, picking is left for noses.

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
coozer

posted on 17/7/08 at 11:19 AM Reply With Quote
Was it a camera or a traffic car? How fast were you going BTW?

Just wondering as the traffic cop would have given you a fixed notice.... but if it was a camera how did it know it was you in a company car.

In the case of a company/pool car the owner must inform on the driver so thats down to them.

Have any of the timescales been exceeded that may let you wiggle out on a technocality??





1972 V8 Jago

1980 Z750

View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
Mr Whippy

posted on 17/7/08 at 11:19 AM Reply With Quote
if it was a company car then I would have assumed the letters would have been sent there as that would be the registered address.

probably still on some blonde HIR girls desk being used as a note pad

jail for you I'm afraid






View User's Profile E-Mail User Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
jabbahutt

posted on 17/7/08 at 11:19 AM Reply With Quote
I'm certainly no expert so check this. There was a case last year that was getting a lot of publicity in the news about a bloke with a classic car who was zapped by a camera.

His defence was that in British law you shouldn't be forced to provide information that will then be used against you (i.e telling them it was you driving) his defence was that British law is innocent until proven guilty and the onus is on the police to prove you were driving not the other way around.

May be worth a google check or maybe some one here knows more about it. Last I heard it was going to the court of human rights.

Best of luck
Nigel






View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
iank

posted on 17/7/08 at 11:22 AM Reply With Quote
I'd phone them up, explain you never received the forms - ask where they sent them - if it's the company address and they were never passed on then the company that has failed to identify (though they obviously have).

If sent to you I believe they send all the forms etc. with the equivalent of a proof of posting rather than registered post. If it gets to court they will have to convince a magistrate that the PO is reliable...

If you're happy to take the points and fine for the speeding and say you'll fight the failing to give evidence charge. I suspect they'll drop it as they will want to avoid the hassle and expense.





--
Never argue with an idiot. They drag you down to their level, then beat you with experience.
Anonymous

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
jabbahutt

posted on 17/7/08 at 11:22 AM Reply With Quote
http://www.trafficlawyer4u.co.uk/speedingCase.htm

worth a read






View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
JAG

posted on 17/7/08 at 11:23 AM Reply With Quote
I'm currently involved in a similar thing.

BAD NEWS; The Police do not have to ensure you recieve the summons or any letter they send. If it has been posted to the correct address (they may have proof) then you are assumed to have recieved it! (Tossers eh!)

I would try ringing the court and explaining what has happened. I would also contact the company you were working for at the time. If they recieved the doc's but did nothing with them (they didn't contact you etc...) this may help your case - especially if they will sign something to this effect.





Justin


Who is this super hero? Sarge? ...No.
Rosemary, the telephone operator? ...No.
Penry, the mild-mannered janitor? ...Could be!

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
mookaloid

posted on 17/7/08 at 11:26 AM Reply With Quote
Might be some stuff here





"That thing you're thinking - it wont be that."


View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
omega0684

posted on 17/7/08 at 11:27 AM Reply With Quote
coozer,

they are claiming that i was going 60 in a 40, the road was leading out of the suburbs and into the country. i reckon i was doing about 50 at most, and it was a mobile camera van that caught me.

View User's Profile E-Mail User Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
Benzine

posted on 17/7/08 at 11:29 AM Reply With Quote
U DUN BAD 2
View User's Profile E-Mail User Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
Dangle_kt

posted on 17/7/08 at 11:49 AM Reply With Quote
Can you prove that you could see the national speed limit signs from where they snapped you?

I think you are allowed to accelerate TOWARDS the national speed limit signs....

View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
iiyama

posted on 17/7/08 at 11:50 AM Reply With Quote
The above is NOT true. If your in a 30 heading toward NSL signs and accelerate toward 60/70 mph then you are speeding within a 30mph zone.





If its broke, fix it. If it aint broke, take it apart and find out how it works!

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
adithorp

posted on 17/7/08 at 12:05 PM Reply With Quote
i had a similar thing 18 mounths ago in my work van. I as the company retuned the first form infoming on myself as driver. That was the last I heard of it untill the court summons.

I phoned the court and they said send an explination to court or appear in person and explain. I sent the letter and it was dealt with in my absense. £100 and 3 points (first in 23 years).

Staffordshire do driver awareness lessons as an alternative to points/fine I think.

adrian

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
woodster

posted on 17/7/08 at 12:15 PM Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Mr Whippy
if it was a company car then I would have assumed the letters would have been sent there as that would be the registered address.

probably still on some blonde HIR girls desk being used as a note pad

jail for you I'm afraid



Its always comes back to office girls with you Mr Whippy

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
Mr Whippy

posted on 17/7/08 at 12:25 PM Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by woodster
quote:
Originally posted by Mr Whippy
if it was a company car then I would have assumed the letters would have been sent there as that would be the registered address.

probably still on some blonde HIR girls desk being used as a note pad

jail for you I'm afraid



Its always comes back to office girls with you Mr Whippy



says the guy with a naked butt as his avatar, I worry where Brown is wanting to put that thumb , anyway I'm surrounded, what you expect??


[Edited on 17/7/08 by Mr Whippy]






View User's Profile E-Mail User Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
jimgiblett

posted on 17/7/08 at 12:53 PM Reply With Quote
My understanding of the process is that a notice of intended prosecution will be sent to the registered keeper of the vehicle. The recipient will then either state it was them driving or name the driver the form will then be sent back. If the vehicle is company owned they should have records to identify who was driving at the time of the alledged offence. A new NIP will then be issued to the named driver. If they admit the alledged offence then a fixed penalty will be issued. If the form is not returned a summons will be issued.

It sounds to me that your employer has indicated that you are the driver but you have either not received or failed to reply to the 2nd issue NIP.

As Paultiger6 says I would speak to the clerk of the court for advice. Telling them the circumstances and that you would like to plead guilty. It is unlikely that the process with the summons can be reversed and you may wish to attend court. I dont know what 60 in a 40 will bring in points and you may want to take qualified legal advice.

- Jim

View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member

New Topic New Poll New Reply


go to top






Website design and SEO by Studio Montage

All content © 2001-16 LocostBuilders. Reproduction prohibited
Opinions expressed in public posts are those of the author and do not necessarily represent
the views of other users or any member of the LocostBuilders team.
Running XMB 1.8 Partagium [© 2002 XMB Group] on Apache under CentOS Linux
Founded, built and operated by ChrisW.