Board logo

low mounted header tanks
blakep82 - 26/2/10 at 02:53 PM

can't remember if i asked this before, and if i did, i can't remember getting the answer...

if my pressure cap on a header tank is not the highest point of the system, what will be the effects?

all i can think of is you might get a tiny air bubble in the top of the radiator and engine when the car's not running, but when its all up to pressure and stuff, that air should still be forced into the header tank, completely filling the engine and radiator with coolant. this would be helped by the water pump sucking some fluid out of the bottom of the header also.

i've got a air bleed on my thermostat housing and on the radiator also. i would intend to T them together to go to the top of the header

i can't get my head round why it would be a bad idea to not have the header mounted at the top

sorry if its a stupid question, but i just can't understand it lol

i tried drawing a diagram, but for some reason the photo archive ain't playing...

[Edited on 26/2/10 by blakep82]


boggle - 26/2/10 at 03:00 PM

if its not the highest point i would have thought you would have issues with gas expanding in the wrong places???


blakep82 - 26/2/10 at 03:03 PM

as far as i can tell, it would just expand into the header tank. i suppose the only other issue might be all settle and fill the header tank with water, leaving spaces in the engine and radiator, but again, once started should sort itself out i'd have thought


Bluemoon - 26/2/10 at 03:09 PM

quote:
Originally posted by blakep82
as far as i can tell, it would just expand into the header tank. i suppose the only other issue might be all settle and fill the header tank with water, leaving spaces in the engine and radiator, but again, once started should sort itself out i'd have thought


Not sure about that, the air will still find it's way to the highest place, you could consider an expansion bottle instead...

Remember any air will expand much more than the water, pressurizing the system, you may force the water out of the header tank preasure cap before the system removes the air to the header tank, where it would escape via the pressure cap..

My header tank is lower than the heater, this seems to work fine (I have an air bleed valves I use during filling at the highest point), but the header tank level is still higher than the highest waterway in the head.. Personally I would want the header tank minim to be higher than the highest water way in the head.. That way you should all-ways have the head full of water...

Dan

[Edited on 26/2/10 by Bluemoon]


blakep82 - 26/2/10 at 03:53 PM

i see what you mean, but if you think about your heater being above the header tank, the header is not the highest point, and so its a simialr set up to what i'm thinking isn't it? sort of? lol

i may have to get a custom, very tall header made then the only bracket (or place to fit it) i've got is about half the way up the radiator.

suppose i had a header tank, with a very long neck on it so the cap sits at the same level as the radiator. that could do it i guess, but i really want one very cheap


r1_pete - 26/2/10 at 03:54 PM

You will get airlocks in the higher points on the system, which will result in poor coolant circulation, coolant loss, and overheating.


907 - 26/2/10 at 04:22 PM

I have a smallish pipe (8mm i/d) from the highest point (thermostat housing) to the BOTTOM of my expansion / header tank.

As I see it, air collects at the highest point and when heated expands along the pipe and bubbles into the half filled tank.

On cooling only water can be sucked back into the engine.

The only issue is filling the system from scratch, but if I squeeze the top rad hose this forces air into the tank, and releasing it
sucks water back. Repeat ten or so times and all the air is gone.

This works for me.

Cheers
Paul G


britishtrident - 26/2/10 at 05:30 PM

The header tank dosen't need to be at the highest point but it should be directly connected to the highest point --- ie air gets forced into the header tank by expansion but if the pipe is arranged so only coolant can drawn back on cooling all will be well.

In short the vent pipe from the highest point should enter the coolant tank at bottom of the tank.

[Edited on 26/2/10 by britishtrident]


blakep82 - 27/2/10 at 02:30 PM

so it CAN be done as long as the system looks a bit like this
Description
Description


good times. i'll try and get some photos of the problem


NS Dev - 27/2/10 at 04:44 PM

the above pic won't work because gravity will simply fill the header tank and the airspace will move to the top of the system, i..e rad and engine............

its much better/easier if you get the header to the top of the system......how tricky can it be?

I've done it in an autograss car where the top of the radiator is only an inch below the roof of the car! Ok there's a hole in the roof to access the pressure cap, but hey!


blakep82 - 27/2/10 at 05:12 PM

its very tricky, because i've got no brackets on the chassis, and nowhere on the chassis to put a bracket higher than the radiator, because the radiator is right up to the bonnet as it is, and i'm not putting a hole in the bonnet for it. the only place i've got left is half way up the radiator. i could put a long neck on top of the tank to put it just above the radiator, but with the neck being about 30cm higher than the tank and bracket, i can see it breaking from fatigue and vibration

the air moving to the top, as it drains to the header tank, where will this air come from?

i don't know why no one can agree on an answer to this lol


907 - 27/2/10 at 05:34 PM

Crap pic, but this is what I have.

Paul G Rescued attachment water pipe.jpg
Rescued attachment water pipe.jpg


907 - 27/2/10 at 05:41 PM

On the car Rescued attachment IMGP1484-s.jpg
Rescued attachment IMGP1484-s.jpg


rusty nuts - 27/2/10 at 07:03 PM

Methinks the pipe from the rad overflow looks a bit close to the timing belt Paul?


907 - 27/2/10 at 08:16 PM

quote:
Originally posted by rusty nuts
Methinks the pipe from the rad overflow looks a bit close to the timing belt Paul?




It's OK Mel, it doesn't move.


MikeRJ - 27/2/10 at 10:19 PM

quote:
Originally posted by blakep82
i don't know why no one can agree on an answer to this lol


Because it depends on what you mean by "header tank". If you have a system where the pressure cap is on a separate tank and coolant continuously flows through it, then clearly it will not hold air for any length of time, it will find it's way to the top of the engine as Nat says. Also undoing the pressure cap will dump half the coolant out of your engine.

If you simply have a catch tank to hold excess water that has been forced through a two way pressure cap due to expansion (like Pauls) then it can safely be mounted below the top of the engine since there is no continuous flow of water through the tank.


Strontium Dog - 28/2/10 at 11:01 AM

The whole point of the header tank being higher than the rest of the cooling system is to collect air. An expansion tank does NOT do this.

Old cars had expansion tanks but the modern and much better way is to have a proper header tank which is pressurised (unlike an expansion tank) above the engine and with a couple of returns to the lower coolant pipes.

If you allow air into your coolant system then you are asking for trouble. Air pockets can form around the cylinders causing uneven cooling amd increased localised bore wear or failure. Cavitation in the water pump and poor head cooling also spring to mind. People often run swirl pots to help get rid of air in the system as it is such an important point with any engine let alone one that gets a caning!

While this is not the only way and an expansion vessel will do, IMHO it is by far better to run the later system with a proper header tank

[Edited on 28/2/10 by Strontium Dog]