where can i get a longer 1st rear ratio for my Type 9 gearbox?
or do i have to buy a full gearkit?
i have someone locally who will assemble the gearbox for me
i believe the diesel sierra type nine has a longer fist gear
quote:
Originally posted by rash12
i believe the diesel sierra type nine has a longer fist gear
quote:
Originally posted by rash12
i believe the diesel sierra type nine has a longer fist gear
P100/Desiel box has 3.9 1st
Standard Type 9 has 3.6
V6 Type 9 has 3.3 and a longer input shaft
Burtons do a 2.98 main shaft first gear and used layshaft £280
I think 1st should be 2.7 to 2.5 with a 3.9 diff
^^ the advantage of the BGH kit is that for a few ££ extra you can significantly boost the strength of the box too
I was going to use a HD long 1st gearset for mine, but someone I know had an unused BGH 'E8' box (the top spec one) gathering dust
quote:
Originally posted by mcerd1
^^ the advantage of the BGH kit is that for a few ££ extra you can significantly boost the strength of the box too
I was going to use a HD long 1st gearset for mine, but someone I know had an unused BGH 'E8' box (the top spec one) gathering dust
If you buy the Capri 2.8 box the chances are the input shaftwill be too long, it can be shortened very carefully with a grinder. BGH and First Motion can supply the gear kits you need plus any other parts to rebuild.
bottom of this page
http://www.spcomponents.co.uk/gpage3.html
Just got a long first box in mine. It makes a big difference. Well worthwhile.
Out of interest, what ratios do you have now? also what diff?
quote:
Originally posted by loggyboy
Out of interest, what ratios do you have now? also what diff?
Before I changed to a long BGH 1st. Type 9 i didn't bother with 1st gear, always started in 2nd. gear.
the info I have is this, anyone who knows more/better please feel free to correct me:
standard ratios are
(1st to 5th)
3.36 1.81 1.26 1 0.82
some qoute even higher ratio lower gears
3.65 1.97 1.37 1 0.82
ALl the BGH ones seem to have a less than 3 1st, meaning this would make it worse
Ie
2.98 1.97 1.37 1 0.82
Running the first set of standard figures on 195 50 15s and 3.92 diff at 7k the standard ratios give (theortically) MPH
34 64 92 115 141
but the road BGH kit would give
39 59 84 115 141
if you can get the 2nd set of standard ratios its even better:
32 59 84 115 141
So if im reading it right (that you are changing from first and finding that 2nd is to similar, and you may as well go straight to 3rd?) it would seem
if you want a bigger gap between 1st and 2nd so you can acctually use you want a SHORTER 1st? and then maybe a lower diff ratio to equal it out?
[Edited on 24-8-12 by loggyboy]
quote:
Originally posted by loggyboy
So if im reading it right (that you are changing from first and finding that 2nd is to similar,
Loggyboy, the problem is that you're reading a higher number as a higher gear ratio, rather than lower.
Remember that when you quote a ratio as 3.36:1 the first number (3.36) is the input speed, the second number (1) is the output speed, so the lower the
first number is, then the relatively higher the second number (i.e. the output speed) becomes....
quote:
Originally posted by MikeRJ
quote:
Originally posted by loggyboy
So if im reading it right (that you are changing from first and finding that 2nd is to similar,
You're not reading it right The issue with the standard Type 9 is that 1st gear is far too low for a lightweight kit, and then there is a big gap to second. This makes 1st almost useless, which is what the BGH gearboxes fix.
quote:
Originally posted by loggyboy
quote:
Originally posted by MikeRJ
quote:
Originally posted by loggyboy
So if im reading it right (that you are changing from first and finding that 2nd is to similar,
You're not reading it right The issue with the standard Type 9 is that 1st gear is far too low for a lightweight kit, and then there is a big gap to second. This makes 1st almost useless, which is what the BGH gearboxes fix.
So why does the OP mention short shitfting? Surely that would make it worse?
quote:silky16v, I'm not quite sure what you achive by missing out second either..... ?
Originally posted by loggyboy
So why does the OP mention short shitfting? Surely that would make it worse?
quote:
Originally posted by mcerd1
quote:silky16v, I'm not quite sure what you achive by missing out second either..... ?
Originally posted by loggyboy
So why does the OP mention short shitfting? Surely that would make it worse?
it sounds like your tring to hold onto first as long as possible, but maybe you should forget 1st gear all together and start in second (untill you get the ratio's sorted that is)
I remember a RV8 powered car with an R380 box with all the wrong ratio's, 1st was only used as a crawler gear and 5th was basically only for cruising - so for most of the driving it effectivly had a 3 speed box (luckly the V8 has the torque throught the rev range to partly make up for it though...)
Im even more confused!! lol
So if you change at 6-7k in first, where does that put you in 2nd? (revs wise)
[Edited on 24-8-12 by loggyboy]
[
I remember a RV8 powered car with an R380 box with all the wrong ratio's, 1st was only used as a crawler gear and 5th was basically only for
cruising - so for most of the driving it effectivly had a 3 speed box (luckly the V8 has the torque throught the rev range to partly make up for it
though...)
quote:
Originally posted by Soot1e
[
I remember a RV8 powered car with an R380 box with all the wrong ratio's, 1st was only used as a crawler gear and 5th was basically only for cruising - so for most of the driving it effectivly had a 3 speed box (luckly the V8 has the torque throught the rev range to partly make up for it though...)
you can see the effect here, courtesy of this excel sheet.
http://westfield-world.com/Gear_ratio_shifts.xls
This is a standard type 9. You can see the drop off in revs from 1st to 2nd.
Type 9 std ratios
This is a long first set up. You can see the revs drop nowhere near as far, and the engine will remain 'on the cam'
Type 9 long 1st