Have anybody mounted diff and/or engine+transmission directly on chassis, without rubber mounts?
I' we done search but found no topic related?
Mk Indy Sierra Diff is mounted directly on to chassis.
I think that mounting engine/gearbox straight on to chassis would make life fairly unpleasant from the vibration and harshness point of view. It might
even make things drop off the car!
Cheers
Mark
I' we mounted diff directliy on chassis and planed to make some PTFE mounts for engine and transsmision.
I am wondering how much diff vibrations will be transsfered on chasis?
My diff is mounted directly to the chassis, as are most peoples as far as I'm aware, and I've had no problems with vibration
Pete
quote:
Originally posted by HAL9000v2.0
I' we mounted diff directliy on chassis and planed to make some PTFE mounts for engine and transsmision.
I am wondering how much diff vibrations will be transsfered on chasis?
When is an engine or transmission considered "stressed member"? Is it anything to do with how solidly it is attached to chassis?
Cheers
KT
They would be considered stressed when any loads are transmitted through them externally. It's the amount of loading I'm guessing
you're interested in.
If a chassis is well designed and constructed, then solidly mounting the engine/trans won't harm them as the chassis should be rigid and not
flex.
A ladder type chassis that is designed to flex freely (your F Series trucks are a good example) would not be a good candid ate for a solidly mounted
setup.
What's considered to be fully stressed is when the engine/trans forms part of the vehicle structure, such as in some bikes and race cars.
Many race cars also hang the rear suspension off their transaxles.
Not every engine and transmission design is suitable to be incorporated as a fully stressed member.
Idle interest, or are you planning something?
A solid mounted engine would be unbearable in a road car unless VERY well dynamically balanced, and even then would be unpleasant.
I have a solid mounted engine in my grasser which was not specifically designed as stressed, but is really in racing conditions, it's like an
additional reinforcing member of the chassis.
The vibration from my factory std (no extra balancing) Vauxhall XE 16v engine was enough to crack the welds that hold the screen mesh in at the front
of the cockpit, and also to repeatedly shear off the aluminium rivets holding various panels in place. It also makes your eyes itch at certain revs,
which is ok in racing as your revs are never constant for long (other than when on the limiter) but in a road car would be nasty!!
Mine's not rigidly mounted, but mounted on what they sell as V8 engine mounts, these are pretty solid and the engine (1700 X-flow) just sits
there! The cutout for the air filter in the bonnet is only 2mm bigger than the filter itself and it never makes contact.
Marcus
Yep! Surprisingly, very hard rubber works fine, it still seems to remove the really high frequency vibration that breaks things on the car.
quote:
Originally posted by Rorty
They would be considered stressed when any loads are transmitted through them externally. It's the amount of loading I'm guessing you're interested in.
If a chassis is well designed and constructed, then solidly mounting the engine/trans won't harm them as the chassis should be rigid and not flex.
A ladder type chassis that is designed to flex freely (your F Series trucks are a good example) would not be a good candid ate for a solidly mounted setup.
What's considered to be fully stressed is when the engine/trans forms part of the vehicle structure, such as in some bikes and race cars.
Many race cars also hang the rear suspension off their transaxles.
Not every engine and transmission design is suitable to be incorporated as a fully stressed member.
Idle interest, or are you planning something?
You're showing admirable self control. I haven't heard of Lyle, do you have a URL for him?
I think like most things automotive, the Locost compromises function for form. Yes, its engine bay could do with being braced on top, but the
bonnet/hood is already in very close proximity to the engine, as many will attest to.
I like the idea of bracing above the engine, which is exactly what I do on my mid engine Beetle chassis. It adds tremendous rigidity to the upper rear
shock mounts and the chassis as a whole.
quote:
Originally posted by Rorty
You're showing admirable self control. I haven't heard of Lyle, do you have a URL for him?
I think like most things automotive, the Locost compromises function for form. Yes, its engine bay could do with being braced on top, but the bonnet/hood is already in very close proximity to the engine, as many will attest to.
I like the idea of bracing above the engine, which is exactly what I do on my mid engine Beetle chassis. It adds tremendous rigidity to the upper rear shock mounts and the chassis as a whole.
quote:
Originally posted by krlthms
As I said, I don't yet know how to upload images to the forum.
Lyle's cars are sheer beauty. I'll post that link over on Anything Else if you don't mind.
quote:
Originally posted by Rorty
Lyle's cars are sheer beauty. I'll post that link over on Anything Else if you don't mind.