has anyone built their locost with automatic tranmition? any advice would be great.
Simon,
Welcome, and a Happy New Year!
I nearly did it myself, with a Rover V8. Unfortunately(?) box got lost in post, so I got a manual instead.
No reason why you shouldn't build with an auto. You won't need to worry about a clutch pedal - more space in footwell etc.
You will, of course, need all the associated parts - cables, trans oil cooler (if any) etc
Production car "auto versions" generally slightly slower and less fuel efficient than manual, but in a car so light, I reckon the difference will be
negligable.
Do you have an engine/box combo in mind?
ATB
Simon
Depends which box you are thinking of but most RWD slush boxes are a bit bigger than the manual equivalent. The mk2 escort autobox being one of them. Thats why the rally lads like mk2 autobox shells because the tunnel is bigger. Just a thought.
On the other hand, auto boxes can handle more power than a manual, and are frequentluy used in drag racing
John
Quite a few years ago their was a lad who raced a mini with an auto box. I forget what mods he made but he won quite often with it, and when you looked in the car it looked like a manual gear lever (looked was the operative word).
There is at least one Rover V8 auto locost about, remember it PTM ?
the one with the "neon" shifter ???
BTW, summat to think about, i did try the auto route in a mid engined YB cosworth powerd autograss car, work'd fine till you lifted mid corner, its a
bit like dipping the clutch, not a good idea when your sideways.......it was a pig to drive hard around corners, went off line much quicker but lost
all the advantage in corners............
[Edited on 3/1/03 by Jon Ison]
quote:
There is at least one Rover V8 auto locost about, remember it PTM ?
the one with the "neon" shifter ???:quote:
I'm trying to forget it, will the nightmares never end?
stephen_gusterson - 3/1/03 at 08:22 PMi concur that auto boxes are generally bigger. what you gain in losing a pedal you might lose by making the tranny tunnel bigger.
atb
steve
interestedparty - 3/1/03 at 08:27 PMMostly it's the bellhousing that's the problem, and forces a narrower footwell to be constructed The bellhousing will be pretty much the same, auto or manual.
John