Printable Version | Subscribe | Add to Favourites
New Topic New Poll New Reply
Author: Subject: throttle bodies
alainmengoli@hotmail.com

posted on 23/3/04 at 08:17 AM Reply With Quote
throttle bodies

I've seen what seem very expensive fuel injection throttle bodies on engines before. The only thing I dont understand is how it works out the fuel/air misture as their is no air meter thing?
Can they be bought for any engine i.e. alfa boxer 16v?

View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
timf

posted on 23/3/04 at 09:29 AM Reply With Quote
have a look at this site http://www.jenvey.co.uk will answer most of the questions
View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
mranlet

posted on 24/3/04 at 09:42 PM Reply With Quote
Mega Squirt!

Stand alone fuel management system would use a TPS and MAP or MAF sensors at the intake horns to properly map the ratios.

Unless you really really want open velocity stack induction, there are better alternatives for less money. You could get a 70mm throttle body from www.jegs.com intended for a LS1, LT1, or Mustang 5.0 and build a plennium out of some steel or aluminum tubing (or even get one out of Carbon Fiber).

While Individual Throttle Bodies (ITBs) will give you superior throttle response, open stack induction can be pretty risky for a drily driver since there is no air filter, and will ultimately limit your top-end power, especially for turbo applications. A well tuned single throttle body and efficient plennium can give you excellent throttle response as is and also be kinder to your motor.

-MR

[Edited on 24/3/04 by mranlet]

View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
zetec

posted on 25/3/04 at 12:47 AM Reply With Quote
The ECU has a throttle position sensor, it uses this reading to "look up" how much fuel it should allow into the engine. The "look up table" will also have engine/air temp corrections and take into account engine speed. The ECU is just following a set programme rather than working out how much fuel is required.
View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
britishtrident

posted on 25/3/04 at 10:17 AM Reply With Quote
Modern systems tend to rely mainly on the manifold vac and rpm transducers with throttle position and temperature as additional inputs, take a look at megsquirt.

http://www.bgsoflex.com/megasquirt.html

Also see Dave Andrews Robin Hood site and the Jenvey site for more info.

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
NS Dev

posted on 27/3/04 at 10:12 AM Reply With Quote
most afetrmarket competition systems don't do this though! The extra inputs slow response. My MBE system, DTA, Emerald etc all use throttle position and crank position only and just lookup on the eprom from these(plus correction maps for water temp and air temp) This gives a lightning throttle response, and I have used my MBE system on the road in an Opel Manta for a couple of years with no problems. I think the extra inputs are overkill unless you have to meet the very latest emmission requirements, particularly the air mass meter which is very slow to react (relative to engine!)
View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member

New Topic New Poll New Reply


go to top






Website design and SEO by Studio Montage

All content © 2001-16 LocostBuilders. Reproduction prohibited
Opinions expressed in public posts are those of the author and do not necessarily represent
the views of other users or any member of the LocostBuilders team.
Running XMB 1.8 Partagium [© 2002 XMB Group] on Apache under CentOS Linux
Founded, built and operated by ChrisW.