Printable Version | Subscribe | Add to Favourites
New Topic New Poll New Reply
Author: Subject: The choice of the future??
cjwood23

posted on 10/11/11 at 04:27 PM Reply With Quote
The choice of the future??

Noticed this on Pistonheads earlier:

** LINKY Ford reveals 125bhp 1000cc engine LINKY**

Might make a good choice in a couple of years for kits with the lower emissions & tax.

Sounds like a decent output and I'm sure with a bit of tweaking it could be a bit higher.





______________________

Chris

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
afj

posted on 10/11/11 at 05:01 PM Reply With Quote
nice but not really new i think autocar spoke to ford 5 years ago and they said that in a few years the family hatchback would be powered by 1000cc or less turbo engine to meet emmisions still rubbish compared to a bike engine





eerrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
BenB

posted on 10/11/11 at 05:04 PM Reply With Quote
114g/km isn't that amazing. My 8 year old diesel does better than that
View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
dlatch

posted on 10/11/11 at 05:46 PM Reply With Quote
99.9% of PH missed the whole point of the engine as a cheap way to propel medium/small sized cars for the masses and not sounding like a tractor

good to see petrol making a come back imo

View User's Profile E-Mail User Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
LBMEFM

posted on 10/11/11 at 07:14 PM Reply With Quote
As "afj" said, still rubbish compared to a bike engine, bring on the comments CEC boys
View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
blakep82

posted on 10/11/11 at 07:37 PM Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by LBMEFM
As "afj" said, still rubbish compared to a bike engine, bring on the comments CEC boys


how long would a 1000cc bike engine last in a focus i wonder? hmm?





________________________

IVA manual link http://www.businesslink.gov.uk/bdotg/action/detail?type=RESOURCES&itemId=1081997083

don't write OT on a new thread title, you're creating the topic, everything you write is very much ON topic!

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
MikeFellows

posted on 10/11/11 at 07:45 PM Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by blakep82
quote:
Originally posted by LBMEFM
As "afj" said, still rubbish compared to a bike engine, bring on the comments CEC boys


how long would a 1000cc bike engine last in a focus i wonder? hmm?


what a ridiculous idea, putting a bike engine in a focus..

im out






View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
dinosaurjuice

posted on 10/11/11 at 09:28 PM Reply With Quote
it still burns oil. were going to burn every last drop so the main objective should be burning it cleanly... not slowly. just my opinion!
View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
nick205

posted on 10/11/11 at 09:29 PM Reply With Quote
114g/km and 56.5mpg are hardly great figures are they?

The size/cost saving of losing the 4th cylinder is probably more than lost in the cost and packaging of the turbo.

3cyl engines sounds odd however you fuel them so you might as well use diesel.

No manufacturer is really taking the bull by the horns and making proper lightweight tin tops. I keep seeing the new VW Polo and mistaking it for a Golf it's so big and heavy.






View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
dray13dad

posted on 10/11/11 at 09:37 PM Reply With Quote
But whats that stuck on the end of the head?? A vac pump ? so making it a diesel or a high pressure fuel pump run of the cam? still could be a pic of a diesel... some of it looks like like that French engine with one cylinder lumped off..
View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
mrwibble

posted on 10/11/11 at 09:41 PM Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by nick205
114g/km and 56.5mpg are hardly great figures are they?

The size/cost saving of losing the 4th cylinder is probably more than lost in the cost and packaging of the turbo.

3cyl engines sounds odd however you fuel them so you might as well use diesel.

No manufacturer is really taking the bull by the horns and making proper lightweight tin tops. I keep seeing the new VW Polo and mistaking it for a Golf it's so big and heavy.


i don't think they're bad figures when you consider the car is about 1500kg. and it still puts out 125bhp & won't carry the initial purchase costs of diesel + maintenance.

View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
MikeRJ

posted on 10/11/11 at 10:05 PM Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by nick205
3cyl engines sounds odd however you fuel them so you might as well use diesel.



They can sound lovely, never heard a Triumph triple? Most 4 cylinder engines sound completely boring.

[Edited on 10/11/11 by MikeRJ]

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
cjwood23

posted on 4/9/12 at 03:37 PM Reply With Quote
Bit of a thred resurection, but thought this was worthy of note:

***1.0-LITRE FORMULA FORD LAPS NORSCHLEIFE IN 7:22***

The eco-boost engine seems to be going quite well.

Who'll be first to put it in a kit??





______________________

Chris

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
hootsno1

posted on 4/9/12 at 03:58 PM Reply With Quote
Ford also Do a 1.6 ecoboost as well.
Has 178bhp as standard form and blue fine and superchips do a plug and play ecu remap that can increase power by about 17%.
Bec are in the past





If a little hammer won't fix it get a bigger hammer

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
beaver34

posted on 4/9/12 at 04:49 PM Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by cjwood23
Bit of a thred resurection, but thought this was worthy of note:

***1.0-LITRE FORMULA FORD LAPS NORSCHLEIFE IN 7:22***

The eco-boost engine seems to be going quite well.

Who'll be first to put it in a kit??


i watched it do it, some motor that!

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
Hellfire

posted on 4/9/12 at 04:58 PM Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by hootsno1
Ford also Do a 1.6 ecoboost as well.
Has 178bhp as standard form and blue fine and superchips do a plug and play ecu remap that can increase power by about 17%.
Bec are in the past


178bhp as standard from a 1600cc engine..... [y]Yawn[/y]

The ZX10R makes 197bhp as standard from a 1000cc AND is less than 50% of the weight

BEC are still the future.

Phil






View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
beaver34

posted on 4/9/12 at 10:06 PM Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Hellfire
quote:
Originally posted by hootsno1
Ford also Do a 1.6 ecoboost as well.
Has 178bhp as standard form and blue fine and superchips do a plug and play ecu remap that can increase power by about 17%.
Bec are in the past


178bhp as standard from a 1600cc engine..... [y]Yawn[/y]

The ZX10R makes 197bhp as standard from a 1000cc AND is less than 50% of the weight

BEC are still the future.

Phil


In a 1300 kg focus 5 up?

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
RK

posted on 4/9/12 at 10:52 PM Reply With Quote
Oh how I wish these Ford engines were available now! I would not have put the SR20DET into my car. The weight alone makes up for the slight lack of power, and ultramodern to boot.

However, the FF in the vids would cost quite a bit more than the 20 k people expect. A real racing one can be double that easily.

[Edited on 4/9/12 by RK]

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member

New Topic New Poll New Reply


go to top






Website design and SEO by Studio Montage

All content © 2001-16 LocostBuilders. Reproduction prohibited
Opinions expressed in public posts are those of the author and do not necessarily represent
the views of other users or any member of the LocostBuilders team.
Running XMB 1.8 Partagium [© 2002 XMB Group] on Apache under CentOS Linux
Founded, built and operated by ChrisW.