Printable Version | Subscribe | Add to Favourites
New Topic New Poll New Reply
Author: Subject: Gearbox ratios
locost_bryan

posted on 12/1/05 at 09:36 PM Reply With Quote
Gearbox ratios

Will standard gear ratios be ok if I stay with a less highly tuned engine? I am planning to use an all-alloy 80hp Suzuki 1300 initially, but upgrade it to a 130hp Suzuki 1800 later (largest capacity in the same engine family).

There is only set of ratios for the Suzuki gearbox (from the Carry/Jimny/Samurai) :
3.652
2.249
1.472
1.000
0.795

In comparison, the MX5 has :

3.136
1.888
1.330
1.000
0.814

IIRC, the purpose of a close ratio gearbox is to keep the engine in it's power band. If I keep a wide power band, rather than going for a traditional peaky performance engine, would there be any real advantage in a close ratio box?

How does the lighter weight of the Locost affect the choice of ratios? The lighter weight will give me better acceleration in all the gears - will this exagerate the wider spacing of the ratios or is it really not an issue?





Bryan Miller
Auckland NZ

Bruce McLaren - "Where's my F1 car?"
John Cooper - "In that rack of tubes, son"

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member

New Topic New Poll New Reply


go to top






Website design and SEO by Studio Montage

All content © 2001-16 LocostBuilders. Reproduction prohibited
Opinions expressed in public posts are those of the author and do not necessarily represent
the views of other users or any member of the LocostBuilders team.
Running XMB 1.8 Partagium [© 2002 XMB Group] on Apache under CentOS Linux
Founded, built and operated by ChrisW.