Printable Version | Subscribe | Add to Favourites
New Topic New Poll New Reply
Author: Subject: Xflow bike carb inlet mainfold length
GaryM

posted on 23/1/08 at 08:16 PM Reply With Quote
Xflow bike carb inlet mainfold length

Hi

I'm trying to design an inlet manifold to use with my xflow FZR600 bike carb conversion.

It would be nice to try and make it as short as possible so I stand a better chance of the air filter sock remaining inside the bonnet but i'm sure the length will affect the performance of the engine in some respect.

I noticed that you can buy DCOE manifolds for 1600 xflows in two lengths 3.1" and 4.25".

Any advise would be greatly appreciated.

Cheers
Gary

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
jacko

posted on 23/1/08 at 08:19 PM Reply With Quote
Hi have a look at my photos under zx9r + manifold
my manifold is about 70mm
Jacko

View User's Profile E-Mail User Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
02GF74

posted on 24/1/08 at 09:50 AM Reply With Quote
what is wrong with hole in bonnet - easy access to cold air.

unless you fit in some cunning ducting, underbonnet air will have passed through the radiator so be warmer.

cold air = more power = faster
hole in bonnet = less weight = faster.

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
Jenko

posted on 24/1/08 at 12:00 PM Reply With Quote
It's not just the manifold length - you need to look at the length of the entire inlet system from ports to Trumpet ends.

As previously mentioned, an exhaust cut is not such a bad thing, nice cold air - that said, an x flow is quite thin, and if you can fit 40's under the bonnett, you should not have any issues.

Do some measuring, and figure out if the longer manifold will fit...if not, think about using the smaller one, but possibly using longer Trumpets........there is some useful info below - From the Jenvey site:

What is the correct overall system length?
Induction length is one of the most important aspects of fuelling performance engines.
In our experience an under-length system is the greatest cause of disapointment, with loss of up to 1/3 of power potential. There are a number of good books on the subject and the serious developer is referred to these and, in particular, dyno trials. A guide figure, from the face of the trumpet to the centre of the valve head is 350mm for a 9,000 RPM engine. Other RPM are proportional, i.e. for 18,000 RPM the figure is ca 175mm.
Any air feed system to an airbox or filter can have a large effect on the power curve and must be considered carefully - particularly if the airbox is small.
The induction system is part of a resonant whole - from air inlet or trumpet to exhaust outlet - and the ideal length is heavily influenced by the other components.

So, assume the xflow to rev to 6000rpm - Then an ideal length from valve head to butterfly would be approx 466mm

PJ.

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member

New Topic New Poll New Reply


go to top






Website design and SEO by Studio Montage

All content © 2001-16 LocostBuilders. Reproduction prohibited
Opinions expressed in public posts are those of the author and do not necessarily represent
the views of other users or any member of the LocostBuilders team.
Running XMB 1.8 Partagium [© 2002 XMB Group] on Apache under CentOS Linux
Founded, built and operated by ChrisW.