Printable Version | Subscribe | Add to Favourites
New Topic New Poll New Reply
Author: Subject: Raw striker diff
mkeats02

posted on 13/1/12 at 11:50 PM Reply With Quote
Raw striker diff

Does anyone know whether it matters if a 7" or 7.5" diff is used on a striker?

Going to try and pick up a 3.91 or 3.92 diff to use.

Thoughts on LSD v NON-LSD?

Cheers

Mike

View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
Dopdog

posted on 14/1/12 at 08:12 AM Reply With Quote
Hi
my old striker was a 7in diff so would check before as i do not think the 7.5 was fitted to them, also i would go for the lsd if the track is where your going, if not i would not bother.

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
loggyboy

posted on 14/1/12 at 08:48 AM Reply With Quote
Yeah, unless spec'd otherwise from the factory, it will be a 7".
View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
bi22le

posted on 14/1/12 at 09:55 AM Reply With Quote
There are quite a few different set up with the strikers depending n use. The old ones used trailing arm real sus which is still a god set up.

I have what is pretty much a T150. I have a 7" non LED with rear IRS and was told by quite a few people that this is the best set up for less than 200bhp.

so if tour aiming above 200 when i would suggest LSD.otherwise don't bother.

I don't know of any running a 7.5"diff.

HTH





Track days ARE the best thing since sliced bread, until I get a supercharger that is!

Please read my ring story:
http://www.locostbuilders.co.uk/forum/13/viewthread.php?tid=139152&page=1

Me doing a sub 56sec lap around Brands Indy. I need a geo set up! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EHksfvIGB3I

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
MikeRJ

posted on 14/1/12 at 03:45 PM Reply With Quote
The IRS striker uses the 7" diff. The 7.5" is wider across the mounting points so will not fit without chassis modifications. It's also quite a bit heavier and really not necessary for such a light car.
View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
mkeats02

posted on 14/1/12 at 06:55 PM Reply With Quote
Cheers guys.

Would you trust a diff from eBay?

Mike

View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
loggyboy

posted on 14/1/12 at 07:33 PM Reply With Quote
Are you going down a donor or new components or Q plate route?
View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
mkeats02

posted on 14/1/12 at 07:57 PM Reply With Quote
Planning on going new reg route.

I understand that there is not too much focus on the components providing they look new.

New diffs are pretty expensive.

I am going new zetec, bgh gearbox, new steering components, braking and chassis etc.

View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
loggyboy

posted on 14/1/12 at 08:03 PM Reply With Quote
Sounds identical to my plan!

I have one diff I bought off ebay for about £20, seemed ok, but mainly bought it for trying out how it would fit etc. I have no idea if it works under load. I have picked up a full sierra too, not really for donor parts as such, more for an exhange gearbox, (or places like BGH etc add surcharges) I also know it all works.

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
mkeats02

posted on 14/1/12 at 09:40 PM Reply With Quote
Seen this one

FORD SIERRA # REAR 392 DIFF UNIT 7' # KIT CAR RACE RALLY COSWORTH HOT ROD LOCOST | eBay

Thoughts?

Recon diffs can be picked up for £400 or one from raw £200

View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
loggyboy

posted on 14/1/12 at 10:38 PM Reply With Quote
Pretty sure the 3.92 diff isnt the rarer ones, and ok if you want a tourer/crusier but may lead to quite long ratios.
3.14 are the sort after ones IIRC, better acceleration but lower top end.
I think the 2 I have a re 3.6 and 3.9, so I may use mine to play around with what feels best on the road.

If your in no rush then shop around, but if you get a knowledgeable DVLA person (unlikey i know) you will want a (convincing) reciept for the 'new' Diff!

[Edited on 14/1/12 by loggyboy]

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
mkeats02

posted on 14/1/12 at 11:48 PM Reply With Quote
It is my understanding that a lower ratio ie 3.14 gives better top end and MPG opposed to higher ratio ie 3.91 gives better acceleration.
View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
loggyboy

posted on 15/1/12 at 09:20 AM Reply With Quote
Oh, maybe the 3.14 is popular for the bike engines to control their acceleration and lower revs for cruising then...!
View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
ian locostzx9rc2

posted on 15/1/12 at 10:29 AM Reply With Quote
3.9 better acceleration lower top speed
View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member

New Topic New Poll New Reply


go to top






Website design and SEO by Studio Montage

All content © 2001-16 LocostBuilders. Reproduction prohibited
Opinions expressed in public posts are those of the author and do not necessarily represent
the views of other users or any member of the LocostBuilders team.
Running XMB 1.8 Partagium [© 2002 XMB Group] on Apache under CentOS Linux
Founded, built and operated by ChrisW.