Printable Version | Subscribe | Add to Favourites
New Topic New Poll New Reply
Author: Subject: K Series Installation?
Dick Axtell

posted on 25/4/12 at 11:10 AM Reply With Quote
K Series Installation?

Looking towards future plans, am considering the possibility of fitting 1.4 K-series engine. Has anyone got physical dimensions for this unit? And most importantly, what's must-have requirement to go with engine?

IIRC, critical needs are, i) original key-fob, ii) engine wiring loom, and iii) something about the flywheel(???).

Considering the 1.4 because of space constraints, and it would be cheaper to tax (at the moment). The bell-housing will be another critical item, so Ebay will be watched.





Work-in-Progress: Changed to Zetec + T9. Still trying!!

View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
iank

posted on 25/4/12 at 11:21 AM Reply With Quote
K series is 501x630x629mm (LxWxH)

Source (with a difficult to see diagram here)
http://www.mgf.ultimatemg.com/group2/engines/engine_options.htm





--
Never argue with an idiot. They drag you down to their level, then beat you with experience.
Anonymous

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
Dick Axtell

posted on 25/4/12 at 11:27 AM Reply With Quote
Iank - Thanks for the info.





Work-in-Progress: Changed to Zetec + T9. Still trying!!

View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
theduck

posted on 25/4/12 at 11:35 AM Reply With Quote
You'll want to fit an uprated caterham or lotus head gasket.
View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
iank

posted on 25/4/12 at 12:18 PM Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by theduck
You'll want to fit an uprated caterham or lotus head gasket.


MLS gasket for a freelander is the same part, and you won't pay extra for having lotus or caterham on the packet.
If you're stripping it down replace the oil rail with the new design as well.

Something like eBay Item





--
Never argue with an idiot. They drag you down to their level, then beat you with experience.
Anonymous

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
britishtrident

posted on 25/4/12 at 12:29 PM Reply With Quote
1.4 K16 is exactly the same external size as the 1.6 & 1.8 and the rare 1.1 K16 all share the same block, same head and manifolds. Around 1999 (about the time the Rover 200 and 400 were re-badged as Rover 25 and 45) the ignition system changed to MEMS3 with coil packs.
Ignoring the very early pre 1995 versions which can be spotted by the cast alloy inlet manifold the Mpi 1.4 16 valve comes in two main versions 103ps and a lower insurance group version used in some Rover 25s which is derated to 81ps the only difference between the two is the butterfly in throttle body of the low power version is fitted with a stop that prevents it opening fully, everything else including the injectors and engine mapping is the same.

On 1995 to 1998 versions of the K16 with distributer ignition and the MEMS 1.9 ECU it is easier to disable the imobiliser on this type of ecu.

Most Rover K series on the road will already have the multilayer gasket, it is no big deal to change and all that is required is a two part multi-layer gasket which can be found on ebay for about £20

[Edited on 25/4/12 by britishtrident]

[Edited on 25/4/12 by britishtrident]





[I] “ What use our work, Bennet, if we cannot care for those we love? .”
― From BBC TV/Amazon's Ripper Street.
[/I]

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
mark chandler

posted on 25/4/12 at 04:26 PM Reply With Quote
Would the Ford 1.25 engine as found in Fiesta's be a more modern choice with the benefit of a Puma 1.7 alternative. Both make good power and are small and light.
View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
Dick Axtell

posted on 25/4/12 at 04:26 PM Reply With Quote
Thanks to Britishtrident for some very useful-looking information. This is definitely going to be a long-term project.





Work-in-Progress: Changed to Zetec + T9. Still trying!!

View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
Dick Axtell

posted on 26/4/12 at 01:51 PM Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by mark chandler
Would the Ford 1.25 engine as found in Fiesta's be a more modern choice with the benefit of a Puma 1.7 alternative. Both make good power and are small and light.

That's an interesting option. Have had a brief browse around possible Puma engines. Will they match up to the Sierra type 9 bell-housing? If so, that would be a plus (saving the expense and hassle of getting one suitable fro matching the K series up to a Ford g/box).





Work-in-Progress: Changed to Zetec + T9. Still trying!!

View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
loggyboy

posted on 26/4/12 at 02:01 PM Reply With Quote
If I was after a sub 1.5 engine for tax purposes then i would go for 1.4 16v (c14XE or x14xe) GM lump. Very tunable, easy to get and should mate to a c20XE bell housing with some minor fetling.
Get the C14XE and theres no messing with imobiliser etc.





Mistral Motorsport

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member

New Topic New Poll New Reply


go to top






Website design and SEO by Studio Montage

All content © 2001-16 LocostBuilders. Reproduction prohibited
Opinions expressed in public posts are those of the author and do not necessarily represent
the views of other users or any member of the LocostBuilders team.
Running XMB 1.8 Partagium [© 2002 XMB Group] on Apache under CentOS Linux
Founded, built and operated by ChrisW.