Printable Version | Subscribe | Add to Favourites
<<  1    2  >>
New Topic New Poll New Reply
Author: Subject: Turbo Engines ....
Garf

posted on 19/4/04 at 11:38 AM Reply With Quote
Im not looking for big BIG power. 150 - 200 will certainly keep me happy. Would definately keep to low boost for most of the time.

Just interested to see whats been tried and tested. Any websites out there ?

Garf !

View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
ned

posted on 19/4/04 at 11:41 AM Reply With Quote
Well,

I'm aiming for a reliable 200-220bhp on my n/a vx XE, but having said that you can get 300bhp easily out of its turbo big brother, the c20let as found in the calibra (400bhp has been known to0, but similar money to an rs500 engine i imagine).

I'd go for a jap engine if i was to start again, an all ally, maybe vvc honda, nissan or toyota if i could find a suitable gearbox. the nissan turbo (something or other DET i think) I've heard is a good little turbo powerplant. But a turbo engine from experience unless completely standard will cost more than a n/a lump.

I have been in hicost' car, running approx 400bhp/400lb/ft with a very well setup management system, anti lag and a smooth and progressive boost setup imho. He didn't get overtaken by anything at donington iirc and uses his car for 'proper' rallys.

Ned.





beware, I've got yellow skin

View User's Profile E-Mail User Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
garage19

posted on 19/4/04 at 12:24 PM Reply With Quote
I agree with ned (speaking sense as always). If you want cheap and reliable turbo power go for the engine and box out of a Nissan Sylvia (8v CA18det I think?) or 200sx (16v). I once bought a Sylvia for £35 and the engine was a cracker. The 8v lumps are very simple but better engineered than a pinto and you can easliy 200bhp out of them.

Thats the problem with a turbo lump, you can very easily get good power gains out of them for not alot of cash.

If you wanted to get 220bhp out of a N/A zetec for example you would have to spend a fortune on cams, headwork and induction system.

And here's a question... what would be more reliable?

A 200bhp 2ltr engine running 10psi of boost and running to 6000rpm.

or

A 200bhp N/A engine running to 8500rpm?



Doug.






View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
NS Dev

posted on 19/4/04 at 04:44 PM Reply With Quote
My vauxhall XE 16v engine cost me £400 for the engine and then about £600 for the throttle bodies, management etc. It is standard internally apart from ARP conrod bolts, and made 204 hp at the flywheel, 176hp at the wheels on John Wilcox rolling road in Hinckley, leics, and it does not rev to 8500 rpm. Peak power is actually 7000, and I rev it to 7500 max.
View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
gjn200

posted on 19/4/04 at 08:40 PM Reply With Quote
I was going to fit my 200sx engine, ca18det, but ithe electrics beat me. pitty as it fits perfect. Very minor mods gave 175 rwbhp and a standing 1/4 of 14.1 secs. Thats at 1220 kg. Dunno what s meant by it would be undrivable, look at the jap sports car series, it all just getting the correct set up.





<- Me!

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
<<  1    2  >>
New Topic New Poll New Reply


go to top






Website design and SEO by Studio Montage

All content © 2001-16 LocostBuilders. Reproduction prohibited
Opinions expressed in public posts are those of the author and do not necessarily represent
the views of other users or any member of the LocostBuilders team.
Running XMB 1.8 Partagium [© 2002 XMB Group] on Apache under CentOS Linux
Founded, built and operated by ChrisW.