scootz
|
posted on 26/10/09 at 07:56 PM |
|
|
Is This a Standard Pinto Sump?
Cheers!
Sump1
|
|
|
sebastiaan
|
posted on 26/10/09 at 07:58 PM |
|
|
Nope, it's shortened.
|
|
MautoK
|
posted on 26/10/09 at 07:59 PM |
|
|
No.
He's whittling on a piece of wood. I got a feeling that when he stops whittling, something's gonna happen. (OUATITW/Cheyenne)
|
|
lotusmadandy
|
posted on 26/10/09 at 07:59 PM |
|
|
No,the bottom has been cut off.a box realy needs to be added on the front to make up for the lost capacity.
Andy
|
|
omega0684
|
posted on 26/10/09 at 08:03 PM |
|
|
quote: Originally posted by lotusmadandy
No,the bottom has been cut off.a box realy needs to be added on the front to make up for the lost capacity.
Andy
or the side
|
|
lotusmadandy
|
posted on 26/10/09 at 08:05 PM |
|
|
Indeed
Andy
|
|
Angus180
|
posted on 26/10/09 at 08:09 PM |
|
|
same as mine, still way to low and scraps and mine leaks
|
|
scootz
|
posted on 26/10/09 at 08:52 PM |
|
|
Ta muchly!
Every day's a school day!
|
|
Xtreme Kermit
|
posted on 26/10/09 at 10:09 PM |
|
|
Looks just like my Q's sump. I have an rs2000 one in the garage ready to go on.
Although it seems to be about 1cm taller, it has a wing on the side for increased capacity and is baffled, so I think the con of 1 cm less ground
clearance is worth the pros.
Winter mod list #2
|
|
Peteff
|
posted on 26/10/09 at 10:51 PM |
|
|
What bit of capacity has been lost there will not make any difference as long as the pickup is still submerged. I doubt if it is more than the
difference between the low and high mark on the original dipstick.
yours, Pete
I went into the RSPCA office the other day. It was so small you could hardly swing a cat in there.
|
|