As title really, i am between the two. Which is better handling wise and how do they compare in terms of weight? I can't find the weight of them
anywhere!
I would be looking at bike engines in both.
MNR, Mac1 worth a serious look too
I doubt many people have driven a sorted version of BOTH cars to give a valid perspective.
You will probably get a good comment on the MK here and if you go on www.tigerownersclub.com you will get a view on the R6 as there are several racers
on there.
HTH
Mark.
My advice would be to sit in them both 1st.
The Tiger is quite narrow so if you are 'well built' you may struggle to get in. However, you username suggests otherwise.
There is a Tiger open day coming up at the factory on the 13th June and Newark show is coming up the weekend after.
quote:
Originally posted by tul214
My advice would be to sit in them both 1st.
The Tiger is quite narrow so if you are 'well built' you may struggle to get in. However, you username suggests otherwise.
There is a Tiger open day coming up at the factory on the 13th June and Newark show is coming up the weekend after.
I think that the B/R6 is slightly wider than the Super6 (by about 40mm)
The S6 is one of the narrowest cockpits along with the Striker at about 380mm wide at the narrowest point.
I am biased but I would say,go for the MK,My 18 stone
father fits in mine no bother.
My indy handles very well but havent driven a tiger to compare them.
You need to try and have a ride/drive in
both to make up your mind.
Andy
[Edited on 6/6/10 by lotusmadandy]