Board logo

Shorter Chassis?
goodguydrew - 17/9/06 at 01:41 PM

Has anyone tried to shorten the cockpit to bring the chassis closer to the Caterham look. It looks a little long to me. I have tacked most of my chassis together and it looks like there is room to spare. Any thoughts or pictures?


Surrey Dave - 17/9/06 at 03:07 PM

Yes you're right the cockpit is a bit long , makes it harder to hide behind the screen.

if you shorten the chassis you would probably have to extend the drivers footwell like Caterham do.


JoelP - 17/9/06 at 03:19 PM

other problem ISTR is that you arent too far off the quoted ideal length, ie 1.6 times the track width. With the chassis i have designed for my new BEC it would ideally be about 12 inches shorter than book spec, but i worry that will make it twitchy at speed. I have loads of spare room up front though due to the tiny size of a bike engine.


scotty g - 17/9/06 at 03:38 PM

GTS do a chassis that is a few inches shorter in the seat area, its meant for their Challenger kit but is basically the same as a locost chassis.
I always liked the look of the Avon chassis, it seems well proportioned to me.


SkinnyG - 17/9/06 at 04:11 PM

I moved the scuttle and footwell back 2.5" - the proportions are a bit better; less long in the cockpit, less stubby in the nose.



G


smart51 - 17/9/06 at 04:20 PM

I saw a caterham yesterday and was surprised at how small it was. It seemed very narrow. I guess that narrow and short keeps the ideal geometry.