Board logo

+442 M1 & M2 chassis members
Mansfield - 10/12/06 at 08:08 PM

Good Evening

I dont like the M1 & M2 positions for an IRS +442 chasssis. Rescued attachment Image5.jpg
Rescued attachment Image5.jpg


Mansfield - 10/12/06 at 08:11 PM

Is something like this more appropriate? Rescued attachment Image51.jpg
Rescued attachment Image51.jpg


meany - 10/12/06 at 08:42 PM

not if you are using a live axle or de-deon setup on the rear.

also, think about the seatbelt fixing points.


ecosse - 10/12/06 at 09:03 PM

This is what I did (DeDion setup)

Cheers

Alex


ecosse - 10/12/06 at 09:05 PM

With the pic this time Rescued attachment chassis.jpg
Rescued attachment chassis.jpg


Mansfield - 10/12/06 at 09:05 PM

Will be IRS.

I hadn't thought about the seat belt mounting points - I am now.


Mansfield - 10/12/06 at 09:09 PM

I am also now thinking about dropping the back of the N members. I hadn't thought of that either!


MikeRJ - 11/12/06 at 03:36 PM

quote:
Originally posted by Mansfield
I am also now thinking about dropping the back of the N members. I hadn't thought of that either!


It improves elbow clearance and gives a more pure triangulated structure, but if you want to buy GRP sides rather than use alloy you nned to think about what's available.