What do you generally think of the Aeon GT3 coupe (was 4203)?
http://www.aeonsportscars.com/Showroom/GT3Coupe.asp
Do you think it could make a reasonable daily driver? Does it have any kind of top? Is the car any good?
Cheers,
Alex
The 420 "cubed" was in a kit car review and I really fancied it for my next project. Sure it had a hard top at the time though and it seemed
to look a bit better than the GT3. I don't think those side on shots do it justice.
Still like though and will be on my short list for 2007.
[Edited on 21/11/05 by pajsh]
The GT range comes in two styles - the Spider and Coupe. The GT2 has two seats (my preference) and GT3 has ..... well you can guess can't you
The Spider has minimalist doors which compliment the Aeroscreen nicely. The Coupe has gull wing doors and a full height screen.
The coupe is a very suitable daily driver in my opinion as it offers good weather protection.
Both models will take a wide range of engines - mine has a V6 Duratec but other popular choices are 4 pot Duratecs and the Audi turbo lump.
Thank you guys.
So are you saying that the GT3 COUPE is not the same 4203 on a new name? Has it changed at all then?
There's a gallery here:
http://www.aeonsportscars.com/Gallery/Default.asp
There, they call the car coupe, and it has 4203 stickers.
As for the coupe / spider versions, I think I've seen a pic of the spider with its doors opened Lambo style (as oposed to conventional or gull
wing). The coupe certainly has Lambo style doors not gull wings.
Hey yes, here it is:
http://www.pistonheads.com/pics/news/12097/aeon4-L.jpg
There's a full article on the Spider by Pistonheads, which was posted here not long ago, it's here:
http://www.pistonheads.com/doc.asp?c=112&i=12097
Locostbuilders thread here:
http://www.locostbuilders.co.uk/viewthread.php?tid=32653
So the coupe has a top, great! I've not seen any pics with full top or full enclosure. I wonder if the top is all transparent, here in Spain
that might be a show stopper for daily use, it rains fire during summer here So you would need a cap + sun protection for your skin! Plus temp
inside would raise to ridiculous levels (winter pasture effect). Not too convenient for daily use..
Cheers,
Alex
PS: I LOVE the car. Congratulations Raz!
[Edited on 22/11/05 by Alez]
[Edited on 22/11/05 by Alez]
Raz,
I've just seen your pic here:
http://www.locostbuilders.co.uk/viewthread.php?action=attachment&tid=32192&pid=266228
Looks like a non transparent top! Much different from the pics shown in the gallery and all of the website, where the coupe top consists of a central
pillar along the car only. Can you give any details or pics?
Cheers,
Alex
[Edited on 22/11/05 by Alez]
[Edited on 22/11/05 by Alez]
Hi Alex,
The GT3 and 4203 are in fact the same car - originally the car was called the 4203 and the figures represented:
4(No of cylinders) 2(size of engine) 3(Number of seats)
When the range of engines was explored it was then decided that the combination of seats/cylinders/engine size was going to get confusing so the name
was revamped to:
Here is a sneak preview of my revamped rear section
As you can see, it now has a rear window and air intakes.
[Edited on 22-11-05 by RazMan]
That's very different from the one in the website pics.. looking good!
Hay Raz man - How did the rear wing come out?
Cheers
Fred WB
Hi Fred
In the end I went for a Suburu jobbie that almost has the right shape with minimal modification.
Here is a pic when I was trial-fitting it.
It also has the benefit of having a third brake light built in
[Edited on 22-11-05 by RazMan]
Yes, it does suit - looking good!
Cheers
Fred WB
The rear wing looks very good actually!
You might want to re-consider the positioning of the NACA ducts (air-intakes)...
...if you want them to 'intake' any air...
quote:
Originally posted by tadltd
You might want to re-consider the positioning of the NACA ducts (air-intakes)if you want them to 'intake' any air...
I've been reading a report from a guy who took a test drive:
http://www.tribbeck.com/cars/nextkit/testdrive/
He seems to think that the "Blaze" (ex Pell Genesis) and the Aeon have very similar chassis. I'm unsure about this because I thought
that basically they were different cars.
I was wondering about the origin of the Aeon car design and Aeon as a company. Any of you know if the guy who designed the Genesis chassis is now
working for / with Aeon Sportscars? Also, who designed the Aeon chassis?
The Aeon GT and Blaze both share the same chassis with minimal modification. I am fairly sure that Aeon bought the Pell Genesis earlier this year and
converted the body to fit the GT chassis so they can now offer two models (plus variants)
As far as I know, the Aeon Chassis was designed by John @ Aeon (but I am not certain)
[Edited on 29-11-05 by RazMan]
So Aeon bought the car to use the bodywork not the chassis, and even that with mods to fit a chassis they already had? And the original Genesis
chassis is not being used anymore? Did I understand right?
It seems a bit strange to me that the Blaze and GT almost share the same chassis. Is it me or the GT looks wider by a lot?
Interesting..
Alex, I had a word with John today and he clarified the situation.
The GT and Blaze chassis are quite different from each other although they share the same design principles. The front and rear suspension setups are
(more or less) the same but the Blaze has a larger engine bay and shorter wheelbase (-110mm) The GT appears to be a larger, wider car but this
is mainly due to the bigger cabin (and therefore smaller engine bay) - the overall dimensions are not much different.
Interesting, thank you!
Looking good. I fitted gull wing doors to my MEV TREK 4x4 and the SVA man was hard to please. It made me wonder if I should leave the doors off next time I go for a MAC, keep up the good work, hard though ain't it! Kind regards Stig Mills