Board logo

MK indy again e-bay
ch1ll1 - 3/10/06 at 09:40 AM

quess what car is for sale on e-bay again?

give you a clue its orange

whats wrong with this car?
have i missed something


mookaloid - 3/10/06 at 09:46 AM

link?


StevieB - 3/10/06 at 09:48 AM

http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/MK-INDY-FIREBLADE-SUPER-CAR-SLAYER_W0QQitemZ320034358348QQihZ011QQcategoryZ29750QQssPageNameZWDVWQQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem


mookaloid - 3/10/06 at 09:55 AM

Maybe it's the slightly exaggerated claims made by the advertiser? - smell of bulls**t?


Dazza - 3/10/06 at 10:59 AM

well, the claim it will beat most bikes on the road, haha, most bikes on the road will beat any car, so what is it he thinks hes selling...... id love to see it against an R1 with a rider in the know. wonder who would make 100 1st, and last time i looked, a locost had problems passing 200 mph........ but what do i know???


DaveFJ - 3/10/06 at 11:12 AM

He doesn't say Motorbikes... just bikes

in which case I can categorically state that the wifes Moped will beat MOST bikes on the road....


iank - 3/10/06 at 11:16 AM

Is that good old Q59HBA again - looks like it.
Like a bad penny...

Search on the above reg here to find out the history.


woodster - 3/10/06 at 12:16 PM

old Q59HBA yet again every time its on it gets faster

manufacturers warranty expiry date
number of previous owners

pass me some cotton for my sides

[Edited on 3/10/06 by woodster]


StevieB - 3/10/06 at 03:42 PM

I'm obviously missing something about this car - what's the deal (I gather something to do with the fact it used to be blue?)


iank - 3/10/06 at 04:22 PM

quote:
Originally posted by StevieB
I'm obviously missing something about this car - what's the deal (I gather something to do with the fact it used to be blue?)


Well there used to be a blue car with that registration number.

Take a look in woodsters photo archive to play spot the similarity. We didn't get up to many last time we played.

See this thread for some more http://www.locostbuilders.co.uk/viewthread.php?tid=52221


StevieB - 3/10/06 at 04:50 PM

I sort of get it now - but is it not allowed to use one kit car as a donor for others, or use the parts to rebuild (Hellfire - did you keep the same reg?).

Seems to be two issues here though - the fact that one wrecked kit car has been used as a donor to another, and the fact that the workmanship may have been at fault and there was a dispute.

Interesting.


Hellfire - 3/10/06 at 04:52 PM

quote:
Originally posted by StevieB
I sort of get it now - but is it not allowed to use one kit car as a donor for others, or use the parts to rebuild (Hellfire - did you keep the same reg?).

Seems to be two issues here though - the fact that one wrecked kit car has been used as a donor to another, and the fact that the workmanship may have been at fault and there was a dispute.

Interesting.


We only replaced the chassis... ah-hem!


StevieB - 3/10/06 at 04:54 PM

But the same applies surely - you replace various broken parts and keep the ok bits.

Or is there a certain point where it HAS to become a new car?


chriscook - 3/10/06 at 06:17 PM

Cheap way into Formula 1 if it "WILL EAT ALL FERRARI" (ignoring the obvious regulations it wouldn't meet)


indykid - 3/10/06 at 08:56 PM

quote:
Originally posted by Hellfire

We only replaced the chassis... ah-hem!


naughty boys!.........ah-hem

tom


iank - 4/10/06 at 09:59 AM

quote:
Originally posted by StevieB
I sort of get it now - but is it not allowed to use one kit car as a donor for others, or use the parts to rebuild (Hellfire - did you keep the same reg?).

Seems to be two issues here though - the fact that one wrecked kit car has been used as a donor to another, and the fact that the workmanship may have been at fault and there was a dispute.

Interesting.


To be a donor you need to actually use a few of the parts on the new car Or maybe I'm just being old fashioned.


StevieB - 4/10/06 at 10:01 AM

But you can upgrade as you go along? So could replace most of the parts without problem.

It'd probably be considered a lot less dodgy if the background to the whole thing was a little less, erm, tarnished?


ned - 4/10/06 at 01:24 PM

i was of the impression as was the allegation of the day that giving the reg of one written off car to another new unregistered one was known as 'ringing' especially when the culprit was a kit manufacturer at the time.

ps then the car sold as new to an unsuspecting customer who believes it to be a new car and the propshaft later fails on an un-sva'd or build tested car.

[Edited on 4/10/06 by ned]