Board logo

Another "new car for SWMBO" thread!
David Jenkins - 28/1/11 at 08:59 AM

My wife is wanting a new car - well, a few-years-old car anyway. At the moment she's driving a 10-year-old Daewoo Matiz that has served her well, but is now showing it's age (the car, not her!).

She wants a small 4-door runabout that's not too much bigger that the Matiz: I want her to have something that gives better mpg and is more stable on the road (the Matiz handles a bit like a 2CV on the corners, and the steering's way to light for my taste). It need only be a town car, as it wouldn't be used for long journeys (she drives about 4,000 miles a year). The idea is to get some mainstream manufacturer's run-of-the-mill car that will be easy to drive, reasonably fuel-efficient and inexpensive to maintain - or no worse than any other car, anyway!

So - any ideas?


graememk - 28/1/11 at 09:16 AM


David Jenkins - 28/1/11 at 09:22 AM

Not sure that would come into the 'better mpg' requirement!


mcerd1 - 28/1/11 at 09:25 AM

at least you wouldn't loose it in the supermarket car park


seriously though I think your just down to the usial suspects:
ford ka / fiesta
vw polo / skoda fabia / seat ibiza
fiat panda / punto
and so on......


not sure if this will be fuel efficent enough - but it sounds cheep enough: linky


[Edited on 28/1/2011 by mcerd1]


MikeRJ - 28/1/11 at 09:41 AM

quote:
Originally posted by David Jenkins
Not sure that would come into the 'better mpg' requirement!




Why is economy so important if she's only doing 4000 miles a year?


speedyxjs - 28/1/11 at 09:55 AM

quote:
Originally posted by MikeRJ
quote:
Originally posted by David Jenkins
Not sure that would come into the 'better mpg' requirement!




Why is economy so important if she's only doing 4000 miles a year?


Yeah, and you could probably do all the servicing and repairs yourself. Im sure the tyres arn't too dear either!


rusty nuts - 28/1/11 at 10:34 AM

If she was doing more mileage it would make sense to look at a small diesel but only doing 4,000miles a year it's not worth paying the extra. My other halfs old C3 would easily do 70mpg


cliftyhanger - 28/1/11 at 10:35 AM

I reckon pandas offer excellent value, 2 year old ones from 3.5k, should be cheap as chips to run.


pewe - 28/1/11 at 10:36 AM

One of the Ford/Mazda or VW/Seat options .
Forget the Fiat ones - cheap as chips but from what I can see they are either at best OK or money pits.
HTH.
Cheers, Pewe


rallyingden - 28/1/11 at 10:52 AM

Hyundia Amica ........ My wife loves hers, quite a tall seating position helps with driving / parking view and very economical to run, tax & insure

Just sold one sorry....


RD

[Edited on 28/1/11 by rallyingden]


tegwin - 28/1/11 at 01:15 PM

VW lupo.... Or the Seat alternative (same car different badge) (probs best looking at something year 2000-2003).... Apparently they are great fun to drive and chuck about... Either 1.4, 1.6 petrol and I think there was a diesel..

The GTI version of the lupo shares a lot of parts with my polo GTI.. really well made car and I quite enjoy working on it because its put together in a logical way, unlike the KA I had to work on the other week...

My 2001 Polo, considering its age is almost "as new" in appearence and drive-abiity... if not better... (and I have nearly 100,000 miles on it)

[Edited on 28/1/11 by tegwin]


iank - 29/1/11 at 09:11 AM

Nissan Micra, get something made in the UK.