Board logo

rear ends!
Dillinger1977 - 12/9/05 at 01:35 PM

anyone care to post pics of their rear ends? (cars, you deviants! )

im looking at fitting the rear lights today and cant decide on how to do it.

i have 6 lights, individual stop/indicate/fog/reverse. im either thinking all 6 in a straight line, or in a v shape following the lower line on the back of the arch.

some inspiration pics would be nice
cheers!


Dillinger1977 - 12/9/05 at 02:10 PM

currently trying to decide between these 3...


smart51 - 12/9/05 at 02:12 PM

No digital camera but I did mine in a straight line and it looks good. Make sure that the lower edge of each lamp is more than 350mm from the ground. More than 350 gives you room to lower the ride height if you want to or to fit different wheels / tyres.

Set your ride hights before fitting your lights!

PS. My number plate is in line with the lights and so the number plate light is a bit higher.

[Edited on 12-9-2005 by smart51]


mookaloid - 12/9/05 at 02:18 PM

I went for the V shape layout

Definitely, far and away superior layout in my humble opinion of course!

Cheers

Mark


DarrenW - 12/9/05 at 02:35 PM

Here is my back end!

Fog and reverse mounted on bracket. Later will transplant fog to a round one in centre above no. plate. Cant decide where to put reverse yet. Rescued attachment rear lights 1 may05 resized.jpg
Rescued attachment rear lights 1 may05 resized.jpg


mac1ZR - 12/9/05 at 03:14 PM

Rescued attachment P4070237.jpg
Rescued attachment P4070237.jpg


rayward - 12/9/05 at 03:43 PM

i went for the slight v........





Ray


DaveFJ - 12/9/05 at 04:18 PM

not done mine yet - but FWIW I prefer the 'V' layout... where are your reflectors ? they may add an influence to the layout ?

[Edited on 12/9/05 by DaveFJ]


Avoneer - 12/9/05 at 04:29 PM

V layout for sure - fits the back of the car so much better.

Will depend on your lights though.

Pat...


rayward - 12/9/05 at 04:41 PM

Reflectors......erm.......must have fallen off..............honestly officer


Ray


jonbeedle - 12/9/05 at 06:33 PM

My R send! Rescued attachment DSCF0025.JPG
Rescued attachment DSCF0025.JPG


dblissett - 12/9/05 at 07:00 PM

hicost i think you have said enough
do you know the old rule of holes
when you are in one stop digging


andyps - 12/9/05 at 07:45 PM

quote:
Originally posted by dblissett
hicost i think you have said enough
do you know the old rule of holes
when you are in one stop digging


Hicost - looks good enough from the front, but a picture from the back might be appreciated. Probably even more so it the car lights were visible too


indykid - 12/9/05 at 08:41 PM

i went for outsides in a line, in twin pods, and fog/reverse slightly lower in seperate pods.

the reflectors help to fill the triangle under the indicator/side housing.

tom Rescued attachment light layout.jpg
Rescued attachment light layout.jpg


Avoneer - 12/9/05 at 09:55 PM

Tom, which lights did you use as they are really clear and bright, even in the sun.

Pat...


marshall - 13/9/05 at 09:34 AM

hope this helps Rescued attachment Dscn0550.jpg
Rescued attachment Dscn0550.jpg


indykid - 13/9/05 at 10:04 AM

they're the SVC led ones. at £135 a set (with twin CF look pods), they're not the cheapest, but a damn sight cheaper than getting rear ended because someone missed your brake lights.

i'm still not publicly declaring the reflectors though.

tom


Dillinger1977 - 13/9/05 at 10:28 AM

tom: mk3 supra, yay!!!

some good pics here chaps, much appreciated!

cheers!
Rog