Board logo

And now for something completely different...
David Jenkins - 1/11/11 at 08:26 AM

Manned multicopter

Look closely at his control mechanism... yes, it's a R/C transmitter!

Damn clever bit of engineering though...

[Edited on 1/11/11 by David Jenkins]


jabbahutt - 1/11/11 at 09:14 AM

That's amazing, hell of an achievement. When is the Haynes book out


jossey - 1/11/11 at 09:16 AM

<~~~~ likes this...


GeoffT - 1/11/11 at 09:19 AM

Wonder how much sixteen of those little motors cost........


Peteff - 1/11/11 at 09:24 AM

I'll have mine with some longer legs on it so I can sit underneath away from the shredder blades please


owelly - 1/11/11 at 09:53 AM

Ha ha, you've all fallen for the oldest trick in the book. It's obvious to any half intellegent soul that all the people in that clip are only 8" tall, and they're using a toy multi-copter. Durrr!


russbost - 1/11/11 at 10:28 AM

Love the fact that it's perched on a space hopper!!!

But what a brilliant bit of kit - have to say i wouldn't fancy sharing space with all those whizzy blades tho' - one bird strike & you're sitting in a blender!!


coozer - 1/11/11 at 11:21 AM

What a waste of time.. why not stick with what we have that works OK??


David Jenkins - 1/11/11 at 11:25 AM

You could use the same argument for climbing Everest... you do it because you can!

The main thing is that it is probably a hell of a lot easier than flying a 1-man helicopter - certainly my R/C multicopter is far easier than the equivalent heli (I'm still good at crashing it, though).


[Edited on 1/11/11 by David Jenkins]


tegwin - 1/11/11 at 12:23 PM

Actually its quite an advancement on what we have at the moment...

There are only 16 moving parts.... do you have any idea how many moving parts there are in a conventional helicopter?!
No transmission losses.....
More efficient- No lift wasted in counter-torque (tail rotor)
As above, its more inherintly stable given that it is microprocessor controlled....

If we could just find a suitable powersource....



I recon (provided you are reasonable with software development) that you could build something like that for under £1000.... Pretty good considering...

[Edited on 1/11/11 by tegwin]