Printable Version | Subscribe | Add to Favourites
New Topic New Reply
Author: Subject: Triangulation
scootz

posted on 29/12/11 at 08:19 PM Reply With Quote
Triangulation

Is there a 'correct' way to triangulate a square or rectangle?

Top... Middle... Bottom???







It's Evolution Baby!

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
sebastiaan

posted on 29/12/11 at 08:20 PM Reply With Quote
Top. The idea is to NOT introduce bending moments in any of the chassis members in a spaceframe. Which the other two options do.
View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
scootz

posted on 29/12/11 at 08:22 PM Reply With Quote
Cheers Sebastiaan!





It's Evolution Baby!

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
sebastiaan

posted on 29/12/11 at 08:24 PM Reply With Quote
some basic reading here: http://www.preengineeredbuilding.co.in/space-frame.html

edit: link fixed. I hope...

[Edited on 29/12/11 by sebastiaan]

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
scootz

posted on 29/12/11 at 08:26 PM Reply With Quote
That links not working Sebastiaan (at least not for me).





It's Evolution Baby!

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
imp paul

posted on 29/12/11 at 08:28 PM Reply With Quote
no mate it seems to be faulty
View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
spiderman

posted on 29/12/11 at 08:29 PM Reply With Quote
Top is best but hardest to weld due to restriction of space to get the welding torch close enough to the weld. Using round tube as the brace helps with access.
Ask me how I know!





Spider

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
SCAR

posted on 29/12/11 at 08:52 PM Reply With Quote
Not a great deal of differance providing the offset from the corner is kept small and best would be subject to the direction and position of the loads that are to be imposed.
Item 1 would distribute any imposed loads more uniformly.

And there are only two varaitions shown, images 2 and 3 are the same thing veiwed from a different position.(for a square)

[Edited on 29/12/11 by SCAR]

View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
Neville Jones

posted on 29/12/11 at 08:53 PM Reply With Quote
I do 99% of mine by intersecting centrelines, as similar to the top.

Problems with welding torch size??? What size shroud are you using? I use a 12mm and a 10mm, never had one I couldn't get to yet.

Cheers,
Nev.

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
Wadders

posted on 29/12/11 at 08:58 PM Reply With Quote
That's the correct way, tube centrelines should always intersect....well thats what they taught us at school anyhow,
not always possible in practise though.

Al.



Originally posted by Neville Jones
I do 99% of mine by intersecting centrelines, as similar to the top.

Problems with welding torch size??? What size shroud are you using? I use a 12mm and a 10mm, never had one I couldn't get to yet.

Cheers,
Nev.







View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
Confused but excited.

posted on 29/12/11 at 09:53 PM Reply With Quote
+1
You actually answered your own question. Only the top method produces triangles.





Tell them about the bent treacle edges!

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
designer

posted on 29/12/11 at 10:32 PM Reply With Quote
Top.

All the centre lines of the tubes should meet at the same point.

http://www.shedworks.eu/hints.html

Column 2, 5 down.

View User's Profile E-Mail User Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
plentywahalla

posted on 29/12/11 at 10:48 PM Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Confused but excited.
+1
You actually answered your own question. Only the top method produces triangles.


Exactly ... The clue is in the question. Only the top one creates triangles, the rest are quadrilaterals which are inherently weaker.





Rules are for the guidance of wise men ... and the obedience of fools. (anon)

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
loggyboy

posted on 29/12/11 at 11:22 PM Reply With Quote
Whilst the above comments are of course correct, the location within the chassis may not require 100% triangulation and the lower 2 verions could well be acceptable if it was practically difficult to achieve perfect triangles.

For example:


the forces applied to the front box would not require perfect triangulation in that position.

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
Volvorsport

posted on 29/12/11 at 11:26 PM Reply With Quote
imagine you were pinning all the joints ................





www.dbsmotorsport.co.uk
getting dirty under a bus

View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
scootz

posted on 30/12/11 at 08:53 AM Reply With Quote
Cheers fellas!

Loggyboys pic shows why I was asking... I've seen loads of chassis with diagonal braces like this. In fact, I rarely see perfect triangles.

Maybe I should have used the word diagonal instead of triangulation in the thread title.





It's Evolution Baby!

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
iank

posted on 30/12/11 at 11:12 AM Reply With Quote
Every chassis is a compromise somewhere, a perfect spaceframe is already compromised by the need to put people, engines, fuel tanks etc in somewhere.
If you can get every tube into a perfect triangle then that's great, but if you need a steering arm to go where the perfect tube would then it's the chassis that's going to end up compromised. Like most things in life do your best, but don't kill yourself if it's not perfect.

Having said that some manufactures seem to do rather better than others in this area.





--
Never argue with an idiot. They drag you down to their level, then beat you with experience.
Anonymous

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member

New Topic New Reply


go to top






Website design and SEO by Studio Montage

All content © 2001-16 LocostBuilders. Reproduction prohibited
Opinions expressed in public posts are those of the author and do not necessarily represent
the views of other users or any member of the LocostBuilders team.
Running XMB 1.8 Partagium [© 2002 XMB Group] on Apache under CentOS Linux
Founded, built and operated by ChrisW.