Ghostrider1911
|
 posted on 9/4/20 at 11:27 AM |
|
|
ST170 Best VVT Map?
Hello Guys,
i am currently building an ST170 powered Wesfield.
Now i am looking for the best VVT Maping for this engine.
Maybe some guys here have tried different maps?
I found at the Manufactor of my ECU the following Info:
0-1000 -> 0*
1000-2000 -> 50*
2000-3000 -> 40*
3000-4000 -> 50*
4000-5000 -> 30*
5000-5500 -> 20*
6000+ _> 10*
Is this the actually best way to go?
I could use a 3D Map. Does it make a big difference?
Maybe some expert here can say something to this.
The Problem is: As my understanding, my VE Table is wrong as soon as i change the VVT Table (Because with VVT Angle the Air Flow changes)
Hope some People here are fit at this topic 
Stay healthy
|
|
|
|
|
cliftyhanger
|
| posted on 9/4/20 at 01:28 PM |
|
|
Simialr what I used: ME website had this taken from a factory st170
https://motorsport-electronics.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/VVT-Timing-Graph-600x344.jpg
When my ME221 was supplied with a base map, and then "tuned" at ME it had a VVT map that simply gave more cam advance with revs, totally
at odds with their info on the website. Bizarre. Changed the VVT map and much better. But do have a look at their ME100 maps for st170 too, they seem
to use slightly different figures. And the cam advance will alter ognition tables too, I suspect the drop in cam advance will allow extra ignition
advance and better economy/torque at cruise.
|
|
|
Nickp
|
| posted on 10/4/20 at 07:42 AM |
|
|
I fitted a VVTPRO to an ST170 in my Quantum. Ignition was MJ and fuel was via ZX6R carbs. I just ran the base map in 2D mode with full advance early
on backing off as the revs rose. Seemed to work really well and had a perfectly smooth torque / power curve. Ended up at 178bhp @6800rpm. Didn't
bother messing with it as I was happy how it pulled from tickover to the redline 
|
|
|
