bobqualk
|
| posted on 13/1/04 at 05:04 PM |
|
|
R1 vs. GSXR1000
What are advantages of one over the other? Does either one have oiling or clutch problems? Is there a performance difference? thanks Bob
|
|
|
|
|
chris.russell
|
| posted on 13/1/04 at 07:03 PM |
|
|
Suzuki GSX-r1000 (2003)
Engine type 4-cylinder, 4-stroke, DOHC, liquid cooled
Bore x stroke 73.0 x 59.0mm
Max.power 164ps @ 10,800rpm
Max torque 110.8Nm @ 8,400rpm
Piston displacement 988cc
Compression ratio 12.0 : 1
Carburettor Fuel injection 42mm
Lubrication Wet sump
Yamaha YXF-R1
Type: Liquid-cooled, 4-stroke
DOHC 20 valves
Displacement: 998cc
Bore x Stroke: 77.0 x 53.6 mm
Compression ratio: 12.4:1
Maximum power: 132 kW (180 HP)
Maximum torque: Maximum torque: 106.6 Nm
all info from company websites
|
|
|
MarkClow
|
| posted on 13/1/04 at 10:47 PM |
|
|
Up til 2004 the GSXR1000 had a slight power advantage (maybe 10hp) over the R1.
GSXR:
http://www.corral.net/photopost/data/500/1354gsxr1000dynocomparo-med.jpg
In 2004 Yamaha came out with the new R1, which according to sources is pushing about 6more hp at the rear wheel on the same dyno as a 1K both stock.
According to the dyno below 150.9hp stock. It also looks like the powercurve is cleaned up alot with a pipe (look around 7k).
New R1:
http://www.labusas.org/photopost/data/2/204yzf-r1_chart_sz_cr-med.jpg?8874
I am having a CMC Locost built in the States with a GSXR1000 motor. Both are plenty powerful - I know that 'cos I broke my pelvis on a 2002R1.
[Edited on 13/1/04 by MarkClow]
|
|
|
