Printable Version | Subscribe | Add to Favourites
New Topic New Poll New Reply
Author: Subject: rear coilover angles
Graceland

posted on 24/1/04 at 02:24 PM Reply With Quote
rear coilover angles

whats the maximum angle from verticle you can legally have on the rear coilovers before the SVA test fails because of ineffective damping/suspension setup - i heard it was 40 degrees (acute angle from top to verticle,

anyone any ideas? need to know before i start designing the IRS for the locost

cheers

paul






View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
JoelP

posted on 24/1/04 at 04:41 PM Reply With Quote
i didnt know they could fail you for that. If the angle drops then why not just use stronger springs? there is a thread in running gear ATM about that. Plus the shockers want to be gas filled i think to use at a large angle, apparently...






View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
Mark Allanson

posted on 24/1/04 at 05:41 PM Reply With Quote
I think you could set your dampers to 89 degrees, if the car would be still properly sprung and damper (very unlikely!). The maximum working angle is set by the design of the damper, not the government





If you can keep you head, whilst all others around you are losing theirs, you are not fully aware of the situation

View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
Stu16v

posted on 24/1/04 at 07:11 PM Reply With Quote
....and bearing in mind that your shockers will work best as near vertical as possible as a rule of thumb. Make it a high priority of your design....





Dont just build it.....make it!

View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
Graceland

posted on 24/1/04 at 07:36 PM Reply With Quote
it is a high priority of my design hence asking now and not after

its just that i've been scribbleing down ideas for the IRS system without using s de-dion axle but trailing arm type design






View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
stephen_gusterson

posted on 25/1/04 at 12:30 AM Reply With Quote
i made my own trailing arm suspension, i wouldnt recommend a direct copy.

reason is I copied parallel arm design like on minis and metros. great as camber never changes with bump. however, there isnt any allowance for body roll in that type of design.

this is why sierra and most modern cars use a semi trailing arm setup - allows compromise between camber control and body roll

atb

steve

I can supply pics of what i did if it helps






View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
Graceland

posted on 25/1/04 at 09:38 AM Reply With Quote
ahhhh - will have to think a bit more - was thinking about the roll effect last night - if you could, some pictures would be spanking

cheers






View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member

New Topic New Poll New Reply


go to top






Website design and SEO by Studio Montage

All content © 2001-16 LocostBuilders. Reproduction prohibited
Opinions expressed in public posts are those of the author and do not necessarily represent
the views of other users or any member of the LocostBuilders team.
Running XMB 1.8 Partagium [© 2002 XMB Group] on Apache under CentOS Linux
Founded, built and operated by ChrisW.