Printable Version | Subscribe | Add to Favourites
New Topic New Poll New Reply
Author: Subject: z cars top job
woodster

posted on 10/4/09 at 01:07 PM Reply With Quote
z cars top job

in these days of jobs being axed this is a nice change and a dream job

http://www.zcars.org.uk/index.htm

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
Danozeman

posted on 10/4/09 at 03:22 PM Reply With Quote
Nice.

I bet this is a rare bit of kit.

linky





Dan

Built the purple peril!! Let the modifications begin!!

http://www.eastangliankitcars.co.uk

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
NS Dev

posted on 10/4/09 at 05:42 PM Reply With Quote
lol don't ask about that one





Retro RWD is the way forward...........automotive fabrication, car restoration, sheetmetal work, engine conversion retro car restoration and tuning

View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
Hellfire

posted on 10/4/09 at 05:57 PM Reply With Quote
Whatever happened to that? I remember posting about it a few years ago. Things obviously didn't go according to plan......

Phil






View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
NS Dev

posted on 10/4/09 at 06:09 PM Reply With Quote
you got it!

My (admittedly rather sceptical on a good day) mate who runs ultima was rather confused by the whole affair (chris allanson had contacted them re. the project) especially as their then current, carburettored 2wd chevy demo car was demonstably quicker than the 4x4 twin engine turbo version.

They now have another 150hp more than they did then in the demo car.

They also have another "fair bit" waiting in the wings for when somebody tries to break their records. Sworn to secrecy, but I'm sure googling twin turbo 6.3 litre small block chevy will show up some interesting engineering

[Edited on 10/4/09 by NS Dev]





Retro RWD is the way forward...........automotive fabrication, car restoration, sheetmetal work, engine conversion retro car restoration and tuning

View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
richardR1

posted on 10/4/09 at 07:06 PM Reply With Quote
Was down at Chris Allanson's last week and the Ultima was in the workshop. Just had a few tweaks and has more power. He does produce some exceptionally well engineered vehicles.





MK Owners Club Member 1015

View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
NS Dev

posted on 10/4/09 at 07:10 PM Reply With Quote
He does indeed, but then I also see the odd bit of rather worrying stuff too!

Anybody else looked at the chain lengths on some of the bike engine minis he's done.

I'd love to hear how many minutes they go between re-tensions.

I was worried with 500mm shaft centres and the mini turbo busa at NEC last year had the driven and driver sprockets nearly touching





Retro RWD is the way forward...........automotive fabrication, car restoration, sheetmetal work, engine conversion retro car restoration and tuning

View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
cloudy

posted on 10/4/09 at 07:36 PM Reply With Quote
I also have a very short chain - whats the theory behind shorter chains being a problem?

They obviously need far finer alignment, but presumably the top run of chain has the same force per link as a longer run?





www.warnercars.com

View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
clanger

posted on 10/4/09 at 07:51 PM Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by cloudy
I also have a very short chain - whats the theory behind shorter chains being a problem?

They obviously need far finer alignment, but presumably the top run of chain has the same force per link as a longer run?


You hit your own nail on the head so to speak.
The way I look at it (I'm far from expert), for example:
200BHP over a 10 link run = 20BHP/link load carrying ?
200BHP over a 20link run = 10BHP/link load carrying?

So my theory is the longer the chain run the more power is distributed between each link, and the less force and resistence to wear each link has to endure?

Too simplistic? but my missus thinks I'm a bit simple anyway

[Edited on 10/4/09 by clanger]

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
les

posted on 10/4/09 at 08:57 PM Reply With Quote
The force is transmitted through each link on the driven part of the system, so they would all be taking the full 200bhp I think- but you are right- the longer the chain the less wear.

of course i could be totally wrong!!!

Les

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
NS Dev

posted on 10/4/09 at 09:37 PM Reply With Quote
The power is taken by every link, "only as strong as the weakest link".......

the alignment is fine as long as its done right, that's also not the problem.

The trouble is heat buildup and wear. Chains should be specified so that a substantial part of their path is in a straight line, allowing them to cool down. (they heat up as they pivot under load around the sprockets) If they don't cool enough, they wear very fast.

Also, for a shorter chain, each link undergoes more stress per unit time running, again causing severe wear.

Look at the reynolds industrial chain sizing guides online for clues.

pretty much any automotive chain drive is outside their recommended parameters, but obviously the shorter the path, the worse the problems.





Retro RWD is the way forward...........automotive fabrication, car restoration, sheetmetal work, engine conversion retro car restoration and tuning

View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
cloudy

posted on 10/4/09 at 09:42 PM Reply With Quote
Excellent answer - thanks





www.warnercars.com

View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member

New Topic New Poll New Reply


go to top






Website design and SEO by Studio Montage

All content © 2001-16 LocostBuilders. Reproduction prohibited
Opinions expressed in public posts are those of the author and do not necessarily represent
the views of other users or any member of the LocostBuilders team.
Running XMB 1.8 Partagium [© 2002 XMB Group] on Apache under CentOS Linux
Founded, built and operated by ChrisW.