mookaloid
|
| posted on 30/9/10 at 05:33 AM |
|
|
Not an Indy
Linky But could it be an MK
locost?
"That thing you're thinking - it wont be that."
|
|
|
|
|
Ninehigh
|
| posted on 30/9/10 at 05:37 AM |
|
|
Looking at that it could be anything
|
|
|
blakep82
|
| posted on 30/9/10 at 06:59 AM |
|
|
indy = independant suspension doesn't it?
so not an indy
________________________
IVA manual link http://www.businesslink.gov.uk/bdotg/action/detail?type=RESOURCES&itemId=1081997083
don't write OT on a new thread title, you're creating the topic, everything you write is very much ON topic!
|
|
|
sebastiaan
|
| posted on 30/9/10 at 07:03 AM |
|
|
It does have a lot of "MK" about it. Bent square tubing in the front, the upper wishbones, top seatbelt mounts all look like they do on
the Indy. I'd go with it being an MK locost.
|
|
|
big_l
|
| posted on 30/9/10 at 07:31 AM |
|
|
That looks like my chasis I bought mine as an Mk but Mk say it's not !!!
Check out my blog  mnrvortxhayabusa@blogspot.com
|
|
|
Dick Axtell
|
| posted on 30/9/10 at 08:52 AM |
|
|
Looking at the front-on view, it certainly looks similar to my MK Locost chassis.
However, AFAIK Martin didn't provide headlamp mounting brackets welded directly on to the upper chassis rail. He sold a separate cross-bar,
which was then bolted on.
Cannot see from the photo whether those headlamp mounts were welded before, or after chassis build was started by original builder.
Work-in-Progress: Changed to Zetec + T9. Still trying!!
|
|
|
