Printable Version | Subscribe | Add to Favourites
New Topic New Poll New Reply
Author: Subject: Caterham Vrs 996
hicost

posted on 25/4/11 at 07:32 PM Reply With Quote
Caterham Vrs 996

Great video of R500 vs 996 second video down

Caterham





"I cant do that without accidentally grabbing hold of the work of the divine potter"


View User's Profile E-Mail User Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
Steve Hignett

posted on 25/4/11 at 07:42 PM Reply With Quote
Whoever set that Caterham up was a complete idiot and whoever was driving that Porsche was completely gay...


Disclaimer:- No offense intended to homosexuals, or anyone who thinks that bthroom scales are effective at corner-weighting a car...

View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
scootz

posted on 25/4/11 at 07:45 PM Reply With Quote
... and whoever put so much 'stuff' on that webpage crashed my crappy internet connection!





It's Evolution Baby!

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
MakeEverything

posted on 25/4/11 at 07:49 PM Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Steve Hignett
Whoever set that Caterham up was a complete idiot and whoever was driving that Porsche was completely gay...


Disclaimer:- No offense intended to homosexuals, or anyone who thinks that bthroom scales are effective at corner-weighting a car...


Why's that then?





Kindest Regards,
Richard.

...You can make it foolProof, but youll never make it Idiot Proof!...

View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
Tim Watson

posted on 25/4/11 at 08:09 PM Reply With Quote
That's some save at 2min11secs though!
View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
plentywahalla

posted on 25/4/11 at 08:46 PM Reply With Quote
Is Sabrina Schmidt gay ?? That would be a perfect fantasy for Clarkson, he fancies her enough already!
View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
dlatch

posted on 25/4/11 at 09:01 PM Reply With Quote
i am gay for sabine
View User's Profile E-Mail User Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
Antnicuk

posted on 25/4/11 at 11:12 PM Reply With Quote
nice to see somebody driving it properly! you gotta have big balls to drift the ring..........





600 BHP per ton, Stylus Brought back from the dead! Turbo Rotary Powered!

View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
daniel mason

posted on 25/4/11 at 11:22 PM Reply With Quote
there is always someone on here willing to slam somoeone else! always. dont know why.






View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
MakeEverything

posted on 26/4/11 at 09:56 AM Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by daniel mason
there is always someone on here willing to slam somoeone else! always. dont know why.


I know, and it always seems to be the usual suspects.





Kindest Regards,
Richard.

...You can make it foolProof, but youll never make it Idiot Proof!...

View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
jeffw

posted on 26/4/11 at 10:30 AM Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Steve Hignett
Whoever set that Caterham up was a complete idiot and whoever was driving that Porsche was completely gay...


Disclaimer:- No offense intended to homosexuals, or anyone who thinks that bthroom scales are effective at corner-weighting a car...


The guy driving the Caterham works for the Italian Caterham importer, Dario Margutti. He also did this video of a GD T70

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4MZ3Rbhui7c

I think the setup maybe down to hot CR500s and him trying very. very hard. As to the driver of the 996....he looks pretty on it as well as any sub 8min BTG is very very quick and a 7min 36sec is awesome.

What is your fastest time BTG Steve ? I've only done a 8min 10secs.






View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
franky

posted on 26/4/11 at 12:46 PM Reply With Quote
whats wrong with using bathroom scales?

If you set them up right they'll all read to the same relative point.

They might not display 10000% accurate true values in weight but they will show when the car is set up equal if you take your time.

Obviously IMO but i'd like to see/hear why they wouldn't work? I've a lot to learn on the subject

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
MikeRJ

posted on 26/4/11 at 01:36 PM Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by franky
whats wrong with using bathroom scales?

If you set them up right they'll all read to the same relative point.



And how do you set them up to remove scaling AND offset errors?

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
franky

posted on 26/4/11 at 02:42 PM Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by MikeRJ
quote:
Originally posted by franky
whats wrong with using bathroom scales?

If you set them up right they'll all read to the same relative point.



And how do you set them up to remove scaling AND offset errors?


use 2 at each corner, plank of wood, zero them, put a known weight in the middle, see what the scales say, work from a known point.

Simples
























Or not?

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
matt_gsxr

posted on 26/4/11 at 03:27 PM Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by franky

use 2 at each corner


that will be a non-bec then

View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
zilspeed

posted on 26/4/11 at 04:31 PM Reply With Quote
Having only tried the bathroom scales thing with the ones you have to trigger by treading on, I'll say it isn't that accurate.

As part of my involvement with the real racing cars, we took some readings this way, then used the real thing. Just to see how far out it was.
For our purpose where you're working to a minimum weight and where corner weights are kinda crucial, it's useless.

In addition to that, the car in question will brake at slightly to the good side of 1.8G, and cornering G is pretty awesome too, so messed up corner weights won't help in such a situation.

Let's say that using bathroom scales is at best indicative as to whether the car is light or heavier than it was. It's no use for anything more than that. At least, that's my thoughts.






View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
franky

posted on 26/4/11 at 06:21 PM Reply With Quote
I wouldn't use digital ones, just analogue ones. The readings are just used as reference points, so I can't see how it wouldn't work, even though you wouldn't get 100% accurate weights they'd be relative to each other as you set them to zero before.
View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member

New Topic New Poll New Reply


go to top






Website design and SEO by Studio Montage

All content © 2001-16 LocostBuilders. Reproduction prohibited
Opinions expressed in public posts are those of the author and do not necessarily represent
the views of other users or any member of the LocostBuilders team.
Running XMB 1.8 Partagium [© 2002 XMB Group] on Apache under CentOS Linux
Founded, built and operated by ChrisW.