Printable Version | Subscribe | Add to Favourites
New Topic New Poll New Reply
Author: Subject: Rover inlet on Zetec ?
britishtrident

posted on 17/2/06 at 11:38 AM Reply With Quote
Rover inlet on Zetec ?

Anybody using a Rover inlet manifold on a Zetec via an adaptor plate ?

I discovered it dosen't have to be off a Turbo manifold --- the standard T16 manifold has the same part numbers right down the the injectors although the fuel pressure reguator is different for obvious reasons.

[Edited on 17/2/06 by britishtrident]

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
britishtrident

posted on 17/2/06 at 02:22 PM Reply With Quote
Looks like a no then --

here is a couple of related urls

http://zetecescorts.bravehost.com/injection.html

http://ferriday.co.uk/cnc/production.html

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
bob

posted on 17/2/06 at 04:24 PM Reply With Quote
Its a good find BT

When i looked at the 2 litre zetec the biggest problem was the size of the inlet/plenum chamber unit, the 1600/1800 is smaller and people have used this with the 2 litre TB on.

The Rover unit looks far more compact and i'm sure the adapter plate is achievable by the most engineers here.

I see a fair few Rover T's in the scrappy.






View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
stevebubs

posted on 17/2/06 at 06:20 PM Reply With Quote
Seen it done around and about, but no...

If I ever get round to forced induction, then I'll probably take a look....

View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
romer

posted on 21/2/06 at 12:20 PM Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by bob . . . .

I see a fair few Rover T's in the scrappy.


'scuse my ignorance, but what's a T series rover?
Or is it just a turbo'd K Series?

Could look interesting that's all as a possibility.

Romer

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
stevebubs

posted on 21/2/06 at 03:57 PM Reply With Quote
As fitted to the 220 Turbo coupe...very different to the "K" ... much heavier for a start....

[Edited on 21/2/06 by stevebubs]

View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
britishtrident

posted on 22/2/06 at 12:49 PM Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by stevebubs
As fitted to the 220 Turbo coupe...very different to the "K" ... much heavier for a start....

[Edited on 21/2/06 by stevebubs]


Yep ---- goes back to dear old MGB engine but with a 16 valve head --- come along way from the 1200cc engine that first appeared in the the Austin A40 in 1948.

Seriously good engine, smooth and powerful but too heavy for a locost.
Even the normally aspirated version pokes out 140bhp, turbo version exists in various outputs up to 190 ps stock.

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member

New Topic New Poll New Reply


go to top






Website design and SEO by Studio Montage

All content © 2001-16 LocostBuilders. Reproduction prohibited
Opinions expressed in public posts are those of the author and do not necessarily represent
the views of other users or any member of the LocostBuilders team.
Running XMB 1.8 Partagium [© 2002 XMB Group] on Apache under CentOS Linux
Founded, built and operated by ChrisW.