Printable Version | Subscribe | Add to Favourites
<<  1    2  >>
New Topic New Poll New Reply
Author: Subject: so i want to build a Rs turbo Kit car!!!!!
Arthur T

posted on 25/4/06 at 06:04 PM Reply With Quote
so i want to build a Rs turbo Kit car!!!!!

has any one built one?
has any one got any pictures?

any advice?

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
owelly

posted on 25/4/06 at 06:07 PM Reply With Quote
What flavour kit?
Seveny type?
Scratch built?
Mid/rear/fronty mounted?

Covin do a RST 911 replica IIRC.





http://www.ppcmag.co.uk

View User's Profile E-Mail User Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
andyharding

posted on 25/4/06 at 06:11 PM Reply With Quote
Have a look at this:-

http://locostbuilders.co.uk/viewthread.php?tid=33822





Are you a Mac user or a retard?

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
BKLOCO

posted on 25/4/06 at 06:17 PM Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Arthur T
has any one built one?
has any one got any pictures?

any advice?


One question.

WHY?





Experience is what you get when you don't get what you want!!!

View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
Arthur T

posted on 25/4/06 at 06:27 PM Reply With Quote
yes i am going for a super 7 style with a Escort Turbo engine. my mate it rebuilding his rs Turbo so has a spare bottom end & he bought a new head with cams dirty cheap from ebay. i want to go zetec lump but old ford parts are SO cheap it seems logical.

i am always looking at built BADLY kits on ebay & was thinking of doing a "make over" as this would be more cost effective & no SVA WINNER !!!

Escort Rs turbo's can squeese out 200bhp quite cheaply so i was thinking that will make a good race & road car....... (think i am giving to much away here EVERY 1 will be making one now!!!) DAM

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
Simon

posted on 25/4/06 at 06:47 PM Reply With Quote
I'm hoping to add a pair of turbos to this along with fuel injection.

The more I look at it, the more I think it's a stupid idea. Loads of plumbing - oil/water a pair of intercoolers, and new exhausts

Still, it will be done

ATB

Simon Rescued attachment engine.JPG
Rescued attachment engine.JPG







View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
stevec

posted on 25/4/06 at 07:35 PM Reply With Quote
I will go with BKLOCO and say why?
View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
froggy

posted on 25/4/06 at 08:27 PM Reply With Quote
rs turbos make at least 250hp in every mag ive seen them in
View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
Arthur T

posted on 25/4/06 at 08:31 PM Reply With Quote
Why..................

because:

-it fits in nice
- its a standard lump which i can then tuned simply
- its fast
-its low cost
- parts are readly available

and it goes WWWWwwwwwhhhhh

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
Liam

posted on 25/4/06 at 08:39 PM Reply With Quote
Why?

Why not!! Everyone knows snails are the way to happiness!! I'm having two! Dont know owt about these engines, but I assume it'll mate to a RWD box the same as a non turbo. Just a bit more plumbing to do that's all. Oh and a dump valve to fit so it goes WWWWwwwwwhhhhh - pchshhh

Good luck,

Liam

[Edited on 25/4/06 by Liam]

View User's Profile E-Mail User Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
Arthur T

posted on 25/4/06 at 08:47 PM Reply With Quote
fitting the engine

i went to the DAX open day the weekend before last and there were some very impressive cars...one being a Fiesta Rs turbo (i have added a pic) the cooling was achieved by splitting the air 50/50
50%-RAD
50%-Intercooler

i thought this would work quite nice + if i added a dual copper core rad with two fans........what do people think?

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
BKLOCO

posted on 25/4/06 at 09:13 PM Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Arthur T
because:

-it fits in nice
- its a standard lump which i can then tuned simply
- its fast
-its low cost
- parts are readly available

and it goes WWWWwwwwwhhhhh


I think you may be missing the point.
Do you want to attempt it because you want a challenget that is out of the ordinary to what most people do?
Are you doing it because you think this is the easiest way to get a fast vehicle?
If you have experience in building/modifying vehicles then a project of this type could make an interesting build. and I wish you luck with it.
If you are doing it because you want a fast 7 style car then I would suggest that there are better/easier/more sofisticated engine options.

In your original post you mentioned racing.
I think you should do considerably more research before installing a turbo in a seven as I don't think there any classes that run this spec.
Regards
Brian


[Edited on 25-4-06 by BKLOCO]





Experience is what you get when you don't get what you want!!!

View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
jon_boy

posted on 25/4/06 at 09:15 PM Reply With Quote
I think the turbo engines are a great idea (im using a 1.8 turbo CA18DET from a 200sx) as they are cheap and can easily be tuned to point where they more than make up for the heavier weight. And you get that lovely tish as you change gear. If your going RS turbo i would seriously consider getting a zetec and making ZVH with all the parts though. Jon
View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
NS Dev

posted on 25/4/06 at 09:19 PM Reply With Quote
go for a ride in a 7 with a turbo engine first.


I went in an RS turbo powered westfield a while back and it was, to put it politely....not very nice.

each to their own





Retro RWD is the way forward...........automotive fabrication, car restoration, sheetmetal work, engine conversion retro car restoration and tuning

View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
jon_boy

posted on 25/4/06 at 09:24 PM Reply With Quote
Is it a bit "lairy"? Im sticking with my small turbo so no lag to suddenly kick in and ruin my pants. To be fair im only ever going to do a few track days myself and just want a car that can go fast. And now ive made it look pretty and rebuilt it so there is no going back...
View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
BKLOCO

posted on 25/4/06 at 09:28 PM Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by NS Dev
go for a ride in a 7 with a turbo engine first.


I went in an RS turbo powered westfield a while back and it was, to put it politely....not very nice.

each to their own


I'm with you on this one.

Can see very little point in this option.
If you want a "missile" then go the BEC route.
If you wnt a fast driveable car stick with proven power plants. IMHO of course

But as you say each to there own.





Experience is what you get when you don't get what you want!!!

View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
NS Dev

posted on 25/4/06 at 09:32 PM Reply With Quote
As I say each to their own, I certainly didn't find it lairy, just a pain in the arse with the on-off power delivery and lack of throttle response.

Really not my cup of tea, but most on here will know my dislike of turbos!

They are great for, (thinking back to my past experience!) around a month of hooning around, then they just become frustrating.

A lot better if the turbos are bolted to a decent size engine to start with and the car has 4wd, this overcomes the lack of low down torque and the lack of traction on boost to a large extent.
(see liam's build)

Not really very colin chapman though!





Retro RWD is the way forward...........automotive fabrication, car restoration, sheetmetal work, engine conversion retro car restoration and tuning

View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
froggy

posted on 25/4/06 at 09:39 PM Reply With Quote
i remember years back a survey of lots of top drivers and without exeption given the choice n/a was first choice every time
View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
Liam

posted on 25/4/06 at 09:50 PM Reply With Quote
Yeah but everyone knows racing drivers are fairies!!

I like the fact with turbo cars that you can drive sedately and reasonably economically off boost, and have the on-boost performance when you want it!

In my experience the kick of a sensible pressure turbo is no more dangerous or unpredictable than, say, a bike engine coming on cam. The key is simply not to be silly enough to come on boost whilst exiting a roundabout in the wet and fall under a lorry!

LIam

View User's Profile E-Mail User Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
NS Dev

posted on 25/4/06 at 09:55 PM Reply With Quote
it wasn't the danger I was getting at though, it was the very characteristic you mentioned!

It seems nice for a month of driving, then gets annoying as you have to drive around it all the time!

I'll place a bet right now that after a month on the road you will agree with what I said above!

I hope to be proven wrong but lets see!





Retro RWD is the way forward...........automotive fabrication, car restoration, sheetmetal work, engine conversion retro car restoration and tuning

View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
Arthur T

posted on 25/4/06 at 10:06 PM Reply With Quote
i Love turbo's soon they will Rule the world........u Wait

Q- (I think you may be missing the point.
Do you want to attempt it because you want a challenget that is out of the ordinary to what most people do?)

A- i love a challange...
there in no point spending many many hrs in my garage building a slow kit car that gets beaten by Every thing on the road... the Super 7 was called a Super 7 because it was Super! but now that same Super 7 can be beaten by a pug 206 so i am just pushing the Super 7 into the next level


Q (Are you doing it because you think this is the easiest way to get a fast vehicle?)

A- Nope but YES FAST.........i do not know enought about bike engines. to coment but... i do not belive it that engine would be suitable as i do not belive it would be strong enought due to bike engines working on power to weight ratio.....you increase the weight you put large stresses on the engine!!


Q- (If you have experience in building/modifying vehicles then a project of this type could make an interesting build. and I wish you luck with it.)

A- i like playing with cars & thank you



Q- (In your original post you mentioned racing.
I think you should do considerably more research before installing a turbo in a seven as I don't think there any classes that run this spec.)

A- good point!!! but i am sure there are ways around this..can only try

P.S i like this web site...its interesting seeing every bodies veiws even the turbo haters....he he

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
Liam

posted on 25/4/06 at 10:08 PM Reply With Quote
We'll see

I reckon if you want to drive fast you should just keep it all singing. Should just be a matter of skill to work the box and avoid bogging down majorly off boost?? I'm not really expecting much lag with a lightly twin turbo'd v6 - in the light car should hopefully just feel like a strong engine. Will be interesting to see anyway - it'll be NA with around 200bhp initially while i get comfy with the megasquirt.

Liam

[Edited on 25/4/06 by Liam]

View User's Profile E-Mail User Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
Liam

posted on 25/4/06 at 10:15 PM Reply With Quote
quote:
A- Nope but YES FAST.........i do not know enought about bike engines. to coment but... i do not belive it that engine would be suitable as i do not belive it would be strong enought due to bike engines working on power to weight ratio.....you increase the weight you put large stresses on the engine!!


There aren't any reports of major mileages in BECs that I know of, but boy do they work!! You'll have to go some to be beating a BEC with an RS turbo engined car!

Liam

View User's Profile E-Mail User Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
muzchap

posted on 25/4/06 at 10:17 PM Reply With Quote
Er - show me a Pug 206 that'll beat my Seven round a track!!!

My STANDARD Zetec should push out 170-178hp at flywheel with bike TB's and will murder a standard 206!

Ideally you needed a luego velocity kit - as the bonnet was much higher, allowing for the extra pipework, turbo

If it was me - I'd go ZETEC bottom end, with a Turbo head - fkin bullet proof then!

Remember - Sevens aren't built for STRAIGHTLINE speed - any muppet can go fast in a straight line - the beauty of a SEVEN is when those other cars are lifting/braking for the corner - you're nailing it - past them!

Porsche's are my favourite target - lardy German cars





------------------------------------
If you believe you're not crazy, whilst everybody is telling you, you are - then they are definitely wrong!
------------------------------------

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
Arthur T

posted on 25/4/06 at 10:32 PM Reply With Quote
why is a bike engine called (BEC)

i know i bike engine would be faster but not my cup of T..

i would love to go Zetec bottom end as i said at the begining my friend is rebuilding his rs Turbo & he is going that way but it costs. i think that will be a later project...but the idea is there...

i also do not mean a silly 206 gti is going to beat a 2ltr zetec kit car. but a classic Super 7 had a 1.6 single cam engine with little torque also its 30 years old. this technology has been superseeded.

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
<<  1    2  >>
New Topic New Poll New Reply


go to top






Website design and SEO by Studio Montage

All content © 2001-16 LocostBuilders. Reproduction prohibited
Opinions expressed in public posts are those of the author and do not necessarily represent
the views of other users or any member of the LocostBuilders team.
Running XMB 1.8 Partagium [© 2002 XMB Group] on Apache under CentOS Linux
Founded, built and operated by ChrisW.