Printable Version | Subscribe | Add to Favourites
New Topic New Poll New Reply
Author: Subject: Comparing celeron and pentium chips..
chrsgrain

posted on 16/11/07 at 09:54 AM Reply With Quote
Comparing celeron and pentium chips..

Hi guys, my next project is a restoration, and I was thinking of using restoration manager

It says it runs OK on a Pentium II 350Mhz - but I've got a Celeron 500 Mhz in the loft, not being used since I switched to Mac. Is my machine good enough, or should I get a second hand better one??

Thanks - looked on the web, but everything is comparing newer stuff!

Chris





Spoing! - the sound of an irony meter breaking...

View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
Peteff

posted on 16/11/07 at 10:09 AM Reply With Quote
The Celeron 500 should do the job easily if a PII350 was the basic needed. The only difference between them is the clock speed and the onboard cache, Celerons had less.





yours, Pete

I went into the RSPCA office the other day. It was so small you could hardly swing a cat in there.

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
ned

posted on 16/11/07 at 10:10 AM Reply With Quote
Should be fine. basially same chip minus some onboard cache. The fact that your is a higher speed should help aswell as long as you've got plenty of RAM.

Ned.





beware, I've got yellow skin

View User's Profile E-Mail User Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
RazMan

posted on 16/11/07 at 10:17 AM Reply With Quote
As the prog appears to be largely text based I would have thought your Celeron would be up to the job. Worst case - it will just run a bit slower than intended.





Cheers,
Raz

When thinking outside the box doesn't work any more, it's time to build a new box

View User's Profile E-Mail User Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
chrsgrain

posted on 16/11/07 at 10:17 AM Reply With Quote
Great - thanks guys

Chris





Spoing! - the sound of an irony meter breaking...

View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
caber

posted on 16/11/07 at 01:19 PM Reply With Quote
What mac and what OS you running? If it is intel then get parallels, even on a mac mini it will run windows programmes faster than the equivalent clock speed on a PC box! You also don't wvwn need to see windows as the current version allows you to run PC apps off the Mac desktop.

If you are on power PC there are a couple of emulators that will work but are slower and clunkier.

Caber

View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
chrsgrain

posted on 16/11/07 at 03:12 PM Reply With Quote
I want my macs (mini and PBP) to live inside! The old PC will live in the garage to help out with the thousands of bits that I'll break the triumph down into.. good idea though.

Chris





Spoing! - the sound of an irony meter breaking...

View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
Keith Weiland

posted on 16/11/07 at 08:32 PM Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by caber
What mac and what OS you running? If it is intel then get parallels, even on a mac mini it will run windows programmes faster than the equivalent clock speed on a PC box!

Caber


One word, it begins with B and ends with x and has ollo in the middle. The only difference between a intel mac and an intel PC it the bios type, the hardware is identical so cannot magically run windows faster just because it says MAC on the the side.

View User's Profile E-Mail User Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member

New Topic New Poll New Reply


go to top






Website design and SEO by Studio Montage

All content © 2001-16 LocostBuilders. Reproduction prohibited
Opinions expressed in public posts are those of the author and do not necessarily represent
the views of other users or any member of the LocostBuilders team.
Running XMB 1.8 Partagium [© 2002 XMB Group] on Apache under CentOS Linux
Founded, built and operated by ChrisW.