stevebubs
|
posted on 16/2/09 at 04:18 PM |
|
|
http://www.i-resign.com/uk/letters/
|
|
|
zzr1100rick2
|
posted on 16/2/09 at 04:32 PM |
|
|
Iv been in my job just over two years and still havent had a contract the up side is i just take holidays when i want cant think of a down side at
the moment
|
|
tomblyth
|
posted on 16/2/09 at 06:08 PM |
|
|
whatever way you leave he is not allowed to give you a bad referance! our emploment law only allow good referances on none at all! I your position
I'd find a new position before leaving , then hand in request for leave of absense for personal reaons (prod with your lass / family etc . once
on this leave send your notice bye post! I've done this before !
|
|
MikeR
|
posted on 17/2/09 at 06:44 PM |
|
|
Yeah but business is wise to the "no bad reference" hence you either write glowing references, a standard reference with "would
re-employ" or a standard (aka factual) reference with "wouldn't re-employ".
Everything above board, next employer knows all they need to with the "would / wouldn't re-employ"
|
|
Peteff
|
posted on 17/2/09 at 07:20 PM |
|
|
quote: Originally posted by scootz
One word of warning though... future employers can be put off when they see 'points of principal' resignations on a CV.
Are you a man of principals or are you a man of principles ? They might be wary of that even more so
Try this quiz.
[Edited on 17/2/09 by Peteff]
yours, Pete
I went into the RSPCA office the other day. It was so small you could hardly swing a cat in there.
|
|
David Jenkins
|
posted on 17/2/09 at 07:54 PM |
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Peteff
quote: Originally posted by scootz
One word of warning though... future employers can be put off when they see 'points of principal' resignations on a CV.
Are you a man of principals or are you a man of principles ? They might be wary of that even more so
Try this quiz.
[Edited on 17/2/09 by Peteff]
Yippee! 100%
|
|
iank
|
posted on 17/2/09 at 08:11 PM |
|
|
quote: Originally posted by MikeR
Yeah but business is wise to the "no bad reference" hence you either write glowing references, a standard reference with "would
re-employ" or a standard (aka factual) reference with "wouldn't re-employ".
Everything above board, next employer knows all they need to with the "would / wouldn't re-employ"
Most companies, certainly ones with legal departments won't allow glowing references anymore either - which is why so many just give employed
between date and date, salary at end £xxxx.
Reasons as I understand it being:
If you write one guy a glowing reference and another the minimum facts the 2nd guy can sue for the same reasons as giving a bad reference as
it's been implied, it's a libel/defamation issue.
Secondly, and possibly worse, if you write a glowing ref for someone who turns out to be incapable of the new job the other company can sue you.
The whole thing's a bit sad as so long as you are completely factual you have a defense good or bad, but going through the court system means
£10,000+ in legal costs even if you win so it's not worth the hassle, aggravation and possible bad press.
--
Never argue with an idiot. They drag you down to their level, then beat you with experience.
Anonymous
|
|