Printable Version | Subscribe | Add to Favourites
New Topic New Poll New Reply
Author: Subject: Diff ratios for bec
charlie_pank

posted on 2/11/09 at 01:02 PM Reply With Quote
Diff ratios for bec

I'm currently working on putting an R1 in my seven. I'm trying to gather as much information about diffs as I can. I reckon the optimal diff ratio for the engine's torque curve would be the one that gives the same max MPH in each gear as that of the bike that the engine originally came from. I assume that Yamaha have already done the hard work to optimize the use of engine's torque profile.

People seem to umm and err about diff ratios a lot and I'm very interested to find out more and make the right choice, I'm sure there's more to it than what I understand so far, so someone please tell me why I'm wrong...

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
austin man

posted on 2/11/09 at 01:05 PM Reply With Quote
I believe most people fit the 3.62 to BEC or have diffs made specificaly, suppose it depends on what you have too spend.





Life is like a bowl of fruit, funny how all the weird looking ones are left alone

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
bassett

posted on 2/11/09 at 01:10 PM Reply With Quote
my 3.38 seems to work pretty well with first gear hitting about 60mph and when motorway cruising it doesnt feel too strained sitting in top at 70mph





My MNR Blog Updated Jan 2010 - Track Day Prep Begins!

View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
charlie_pank

posted on 2/11/09 at 01:11 PM Reply With Quote
I haven't yet looked in to what is available/buildable, purely interested in what would be optimal so I can make an informed decision.
View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
Dan.

posted on 2/11/09 at 01:11 PM Reply With Quote
depends a lot on the engine, but from the sierra camp of diffs, for big bokes (busa etc) 3.14:1 is liked as it gives more legs on the long straights and the engines have enough torque to deal with the taller gearing, for smaller bike engines 3.38:1 is better. 3.62 or above on a BEC would be very low geared.

[Edited on 2/11/09 by Dan.]

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
adithorp

posted on 2/11/09 at 01:12 PM Reply With Quote
Yoy're wrong because the bike has far less aero drag than a seven and a lot less weight. With the same ratio diff as the bikesfinal drive (chain sprockets and wheel) you'd never get the car to set off without stalling in 1st. In 6th the R1 is geared to almost 200mph and in your 7 will top out at 130ishdue to the drag.

3.36:1 diff seems the best option in a 7. I'm running a Freelander 3.21:1. It'd be a bit high in a 7 but with the better aero of the Fury it's OK. It all depends upon the year of R1 as the ratios alter from year to year.

adrian





"A witty saying proves nothing" Voltaire

http://jpsc.org.uk/forum/

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
charlie_pank

posted on 2/11/09 at 01:16 PM Reply With Quote
OK, so because of the extra weight and the aero effect, it's best to gear for a top speed based on drag predictions. It's an 06 R1 and I have all the ratios for the calculations.
View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
adithorp

posted on 2/11/09 at 01:36 PM Reply With Quote
My '06 R1 with 3.21 diff gets to 72 in first (a bit long), 150 in top (in theory) and cruises at just over 6000rpm at 70mph.

There's a gear calculator thread/sticky at the top of the BEC section but you'll have to play with the ratios for a later R1.

adrian





"A witty saying proves nothing" Voltaire

http://jpsc.org.uk/forum/

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
charlie_pank

posted on 2/11/09 at 01:48 PM Reply With Quote
72 does seem a bit long in 1st, but then the bike will do 140 in 1st according to this. What is the engine comfortable cruising at?
View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
A1

posted on 2/11/09 at 01:49 PM Reply With Quote
ive got a 3.92:1 on my r1 and to be honest it feels like its wasting a lot of the power. it gets to 40 in 1st if i push it, and tops out easily at 108. im looking for the likes of a 3.38, but want an lsd.
View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
adithorp

posted on 2/11/09 at 03:04 PM Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by charlie_pank
72 does seem a bit long in 1st, but then the bike will do 140 in 1st according to this. What is the engine comfortable cruising at?


It cruises happily at 6-8000 rpm, which is only half of max. I've run at 9000 for 2 hours with no problems ; Ear plugs in at that but mainly for the wind noise.

adrian





"A witty saying proves nothing" Voltaire

http://jpsc.org.uk/forum/

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
hobbsy

posted on 2/11/09 at 03:34 PM Reply With Quote
You can LSD up a 3:38 either with the vLSD from a 3.62 or buy a Quaife ATB.

Road and Race transmissions can help with fitting it if you need it.

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
bj928

posted on 2/11/09 at 06:01 PM Reply With Quote
not my normal calculator but could be of some use to you, http://www.angelfire.com/fl/procrastination/rear.html

my normal one doesn't seem to be letting me on now.

i'm running a 2.73, this give me 61 mph at 6000 rpm on 18" 295 tyres, but i got a bit more power than you guys and its in viento

View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
Wheels244

posted on 2/11/09 at 08:22 PM Reply With Quote
3.38 in mine
View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
Frosty

posted on 2/11/09 at 11:24 PM Reply With Quote
You need to work out which wheels and tyres you'll be running before deciding on a diff. Even a small difference in circumference wil make a big difference.

Then you can pick a suitable diff from here.

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
charlie_pank

posted on 3/11/09 at 09:08 AM Reply With Quote
Thanks, I know I'm going to be running 185/70/13s and have been using the diff calculators based on that.
View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
Frosty

posted on 3/11/09 at 10:50 AM Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by charlie_pank
Thanks, I know I'm going to be running 185/70/13s and have been using the diff calculators based on that.

Cool, so really you have the choice of:

3.62: 125mph banging off the limiter, but closer gearing for better low down acceleration.

3.38: 133mph which you probably won't hit, but it will mean if you ever reach 130mph the engine won't be on the limiter. The gears will be slightly more spread though.

So those are your two best options, and the next thing is to look at the intended use of the car. What will you be wanting the car to be best at? Track days or fast road/motorway use?

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
charlie_pank

posted on 3/11/09 at 12:16 PM Reply With Quote
That's an interesting question. I currently use the car most of the time on the road rather than the track, but I am more interested in setting it up to give the best handling and performance possible, than making compromises for the road. I have had a string of sports bikes and have done some touring on a GSX-R. If I can tolerate that, and given that I wear earplugs in the 7 as it is anyway, I can't really imagine having the usual objections to 'sporty' gearing in a bec.
View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
Frosty

posted on 3/11/09 at 02:22 PM Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by charlie_pank
That's an interesting question. I currently use the car most of the time on the road rather than the track, but I am more interested in setting it up to give the best handling and performance possible, than making compromises for the road. I have had a string of sports bikes and have done some touring on a GSX-R. If I can tolerate that, and given that I wear earplugs in the 7 as it is anyway, I can't really imagine having the usual objections to 'sporty' gearing in a bec.

I would say for road use go for the 3.62 as it will give wicked acceleration, and in reality the only speeds you should be doing are under 100mph.

If you were using it on track, a 3.38 would be a little kinder to the engine since you would be at lower revs at the typical top speeds a track would permit - 125mph max really.

A 3.38 would mean you were sitting away from your rev limiter to achieve these speeds.

The 3.62 is cheaper and easier to source, so I'd go with that one.

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
A1

posted on 5/11/09 at 01:20 AM Reply With Quote
an r1 bike will do about 110 in first.
View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
aitch

posted on 9/12/09 at 04:08 PM Reply With Quote
yeah loads of bikes will do silly speeds in first if you ring the neck out of them although in truth 1st to 2nd change is done early and probably 2nd to 3rd also its just too much on the road for no real gain, and its gonna loose you your licence sooner or later

on my busa geard for top speed events its about 100mph in first and change just before the red line (only 10,500 on the busa) this is a balancing act to get the front wheel almost or just off the road in first and second for max acceleration.

my bike will do xxxxxxx in first its just bragging rights really and not at all relvent to BEC...

if you want to go fast as errrrrrrrrrrrm, someone said build in lightness, but also build a full boddied car with reasonable aero's

otherwise the ideal (to go as fast as you can in the locost) would be a gearing that will see you at the peak BHP of the engine (often 1000rpm or so below red line) at the theoretical top speed of that car with that BHP, trying to gear any higher than this will not only reduce the top speed but also loose you acceleration. probably though shorter gearing and a slower top speed is preferable as it will make it more ""sporty"" and quicker accelerating, even on mst tracks your not going to be doing huge top speeds anyway

aitch

View User's Profile E-Mail User Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member

New Topic New Poll New Reply


go to top






Website design and SEO by Studio Montage

All content © 2001-16 LocostBuilders. Reproduction prohibited
Opinions expressed in public posts are those of the author and do not necessarily represent
the views of other users or any member of the LocostBuilders team.
Running XMB 1.8 Partagium [© 2002 XMB Group] on Apache under CentOS Linux
Founded, built and operated by ChrisW.