binraker
|
| posted on 3/9/04 at 06:45 PM |
|
|
i was thinking (tin hats at the ready)
a 4 wheel drive locost could have sight problems in the front diff department and the front propshaft would have to quantum tunnel through the block
so....
i remember seeing a landrover defender (i think it was a defender but i dont know how old) having its body taken off and a sports body put on, engin
tuned and big ass holes cun it the chassis to lighten it (prolly new shocks and god knows what else.) but could you build a chassis (probbably
nothing like the book one) that took the drive train from and old 4x4 and put it in a re-enforced buiscit tin (which is what a 7 is) add a new engine
and gearbox and make a nice 4wd sports car?
silly idea, no?
[Edited on 3/9/04 by binraker]
what is it about me that makes me look like i know what im doing????
|
|
|
|
|
Viper
|
| posted on 3/9/04 at 07:28 PM |
|
|
4wd sportscar isnt that like saying military intelegence?
|
|
|
white130d
|
| posted on 3/9/04 at 07:37 PM |
|
|
Scubaroo
More like painless dentistry
If I were to do something like that use a Subaru or maybe LR Freelander or a bike engine coupled to a small transfer box and then a couple sierra
diffs and maybe Mini front uprights........We have the technology, how much money do you want to spend?
Check out the DP1 that Dennis is building here...DP Cars
david.
[Edited on 3/9/04 by white130d]
[Edited on 3/9/04 by white130d]
"There's only 2 things that money can't buy, and that's true love and home grown tomatos" Guy Clark
|
|
|
Lawnmower
|
| posted on 4/9/04 at 01:10 AM |
|
|
I think its called a Bowler Tomcat.
|
|
|
JoelP
|
| posted on 4/9/04 at 07:48 AM |
|
|
im with these lot. I dont think 4wd is necessary unless you intend grasstracking/offroading or rallying. What you gain on the launch you loose
eventually thru drivetrain powerloss, and the cornering wont be any better than a well balanced 2wd car (think weight).
as for cutting down an offroader, i suspect its not worth the effort really. There would be so much removed you may as well start from scratch and
build a chassis. offroad 4x4 drivetrains arent usually designed for power and sporty feel, hence the pathetic output from many of the bigger engines -
all torque.
Beware! Bourettes is binfectious.
|
|
|
cornishrob
|
| posted on 4/9/04 at 09:22 AM |
|
|
it can be done, but has been said is not really worth it
RWD is a true sports car, ferraris, lambos, porschs, etc
Jap sports, MR2, Supra, RX7, NSX, 300ZX
|
|
|
twinturbo
|
| posted on 4/9/04 at 02:58 PM |
|
|
If using the sierra 4x4 system teh front prop goes down the drivers side of the engine..
On a perfect and dry road a 2wd car may be as quick round corners as a the 4x4..
But there's no perfect road in the UK...
On a wet road? 4x4 wins hands down.
pot hole mid corner? Or loose gravel on the road surface? Bad camber? All comon on UK roads and all liable to upset any car, but not as much in a
4x4..
TT
|
|
|
Viper
|
| posted on 4/9/04 at 06:24 PM |
|
|
If its got 4wd or fwd then its not a sports car.....simple.
|
|
|
phelpsa
|
| posted on 4/9/04 at 07:44 PM |
|
|
Lamborgini Gallardo
Adam
|
|
|
Viper
|
| posted on 4/9/04 at 08:03 PM |
|
|
and?
your point is?
|
|
|
phelpsa
|
| posted on 4/9/04 at 08:04 PM |
|
|
It's 4wd, and don't tell me it's not a sports car .
Adam
|
|
|
Benzine
|
| posted on 4/9/04 at 08:39 PM |
|
|
Isn't one of the things required to define a car as a sports car rear wheel drive? I forget the other things. Open top?
The mental gymnastics a landlord will employ to justify immoral actions is clinically fascinating. Just because something is legal doesn't make
it moral.
|
|
|
Viper
|
| posted on 4/9/04 at 08:53 PM |
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by phelpsa
It's 4wd, and don't tell me it's not a sports car.
Adam
Your right
i'ts 4wd and it's not a sports car.....
|
|
|
JoelP
|
| posted on 4/9/04 at 10:12 PM |
|
|
nearly all 'performance' 4wd cars are rally inspired/derived. Ie scoobies/evos/cossies and the like. The few other cars that i can think
of, namely skylines, gallardos and some diablos(?) are the odd ones out.
i wouldnt dream about doing a 4wd BEC, as weight is the only real issue with bike engines, but if someone wants to do one with a car engine i wont
call them daft - its all in the name of variety. Dont think id do it myself though. depends what you want from it really. Afterall, locosts and
other 7 derivatives arent really rainy weather cars, are they.
Beware! Bourettes is binfectious.
|
|
|
Peteff
|
| posted on 4/9/04 at 10:35 PM |
|
|
MG Midgets, Triumph Spitfires, all the TRs,Healeys and E types now they were sports cars. Lambos and Ferraris etc. are called supercars aren't
they?
yours, Pete
I went into the RSPCA office the other day. It was so small you could hardly swing a cat in there.
|
|
|
cornishrob
|
| posted on 5/9/04 at 01:15 PM |
|
|
fair point but 1 does not make up for the thousands of others out there that are rwd.
it all depends, yes a 4x4 is a lot harder to loose control of and will feel to handle better than a twitch ass ended bean can on wheels.
if its what you want m8 go for it!
|
|
|
binraker
|
| posted on 5/9/04 at 02:02 PM |
|
|
if i acctually get round to builing a car i think ill start with a book style modle and maybee build a 4x4 as a second project. i also want to look
into a few other things like and electric locost with a PEM fule cell and one running on LPG (i have heard rumbelings from the accademic circles that
LPG cars should be able to out perform petrol ones by 2 to 3 times for the same engine size, but i have my reservations on the grounds of molecular
chain length)
what is it about me that makes me look like i know what im doing????
|
|
|
binraker
|
| posted on 5/9/04 at 02:07 PM |
|
|
http://www.compactpower.com/racer.html
locost version of this?
221bhp continuous but being electric, you should be able to pull about 500bhp instentatious (good cooling required)
what is it about me that makes me look like i know what im doing????
|
|
|
Peteff
|
| posted on 5/9/04 at 02:30 PM |
|
|
if i acctually get round to builing a car
Meanwhile, back in the real world.........
yours, Pete
I went into the RSPCA office the other day. It was so small you could hardly swing a cat in there.
|
|
|
marktigere1
|
| posted on 6/9/04 at 02:52 PM |
|
|
I was always told that if you require 4 wheel drive on a public road at any time due to wet roads, ice etc, then you are going too f**king fast!!
The Lambo is a case in point. If you require the 4 wheel drive mid bend to keep you on the straight and narrow on a public road, then what speed are
you doing?
As for rear wheel drive being superior, well, have a look at Perry Macarthy (Stig) trying to keep the Renault Clio V6 on the track. He even crossed
the line backwards.
I think you should build whatever you like (4x4, rear drive etc) and bravo for having a go at all. It all comes down to balance in the end.
Just my 2p
Cheers
Mark
If a bolt is stuck force it.
If it breaks, it needed replacing anyway!!!
(My Dad 1991)
|
|
|
ned
|
| posted on 6/9/04 at 03:08 PM |
|
|
4wd is quicker round a track in the wet and possibly quicker/safer on the road in the wet, but when do you want to go pushing a 7 on the road on the
rain - not very often if ever. our racecar got pole at an all comers race at silverstone, then it rained in the race and we got beaten by a big bhp
cossie with startline control, traction control and 4wd.
Ned.
beware, I've got yellow skin
|
|
|
