Printable Version | Subscribe | Add to Favourites
New Topic New Poll New Reply
Author: Subject: reaction time,good game :-)
tones61

posted on 19/3/16 at 08:16 PM Reply With Quote
reaction time,good game :-)

https://www.justpark.com/creative/reaction-time-test/?source=awin&utm_source=Affiliate_Window&utm_medium=78888&utm_campaign=Affiliate_Wind ow_Sale&awc=6188_1458418117_6bad960d2043ad2499b04838fbeddf5f

i got 325





mot tester

View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
Slimy38

posted on 19/3/16 at 08:27 PM Reply With Quote
Four tries to get it down to 301... a lifetime of video games to blame...
View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
Adamirish

posted on 19/3/16 at 08:46 PM Reply With Quote


I'm 33





MK Indy 1700 Xflow

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
MikeRJ

posted on 19/3/16 at 08:48 PM Reply With Quote
Not bad, I have the reaction time of a 21 year old (330ish ms). If only the rest of me was 21 as well
View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
Worzey

posted on 19/3/16 at 08:57 PM Reply With Quote
Apparently I'm not human. 135ms

Got a few in the low Twenties too





Caterham R400

View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
Adamirish

posted on 19/3/16 at 09:02 PM Reply With Quote
This is addictive! My 4th attempt







MK Indy 1700 Xflow

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
chris mason

posted on 19/3/16 at 09:08 PM Reply With Quote
Description
Description

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
NigeEss

posted on 19/3/16 at 09:11 PM Reply With Quote
275, not bad for a 50 year old !





Time is an illusion. Lunchtime doubly so.................Douglas Adams.

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
mark chandler

posted on 19/3/16 at 09:27 PM Reply With Quote
I had better give up driving between 400-500msec
View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
40inches

posted on 19/3/16 at 11:47 PM Reply With Quote
I'm not a human being either or I'm 21, 22 or 25 years old. Not bad for 67
View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
SteveWalker

posted on 20/3/16 at 12:03 AM Reply With Quote
I'm not complaining, it says I've got the reaction time of a 41 year old. I'm actually 49; it's midnight; due to circumstances I've had very little sleep since Wednesday and am so tired I can hardly keep my eyes open; oh, and I've been drinking
View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
daniel mason

posted on 20/3/16 at 12:10 AM Reply With Quote
I hit 26ms on one go! The others were all 300+ so I'm assuming a fluke
View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
Ivan

posted on 20/3/16 at 07:20 AM Reply With Quote
High teens to low 20's - not bad for 66 year old. Notice a few ms difference between left and right hand with LH faster than right - but then I am left handed.
View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
steve m

posted on 20/3/16 at 08:07 AM Reply With Quote
im 21 as well, err im 56





Thats was probably spelt wrong, or had some grammer, that the "grammer police have to have a moan at




View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member

New Topic New Poll New Reply


go to top






Website design and SEO by Studio Montage

All content 2001-16 LocostBuilders. Reproduction prohibited
Opinions expressed in public posts are those of the author and do not necessarily represent
the views of other users or any member of the LocostBuilders team.
Running XMB 1.8 Partagium [ 2002 XMB Group] on Apache under CentOS Linux
Founded, built and operated by ChrisW.