Printable Version | Subscribe | Add to Favourites
New Topic New Poll New Reply
Author: Subject: steering rack position?
02GF74

posted on 18/1/06 at 09:36 AM Reply With Quote
steering rack position?

At the moment I amd taking apart more than is being put together

I have moved the steering column back a bit so the uj link is too short. One solution is to move the steering rack back and this is what this post is about.

What is the proper position for the steering rack?

At the moment, looking from above, the track rods poiont backwards. I would have expected ideally they should be perpendicular to the axix of the chasis i.e. point straigh outwards.

Looking from the front, should they be horizontal, point up or down?

Been told that the wishbones should be horizontal so I would expect the track rods to be horizontal as well.

If I moved the rack back, the track rods may end up point forwards a little bit and also may point downwards, is that going to be a problem?

Looking at pictures in RH brochure it doesn't appear to be unless they have not set up their front end properly.

thanks.

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
muzchap

posted on 18/1/06 at 09:41 AM Reply With Quote
Hi mate,

I was told they should all be level, if not the track end rods pointing slightly down.

My chassis came pre-welded - so feel free to have a browse.

My 'mushrooms' are wrong hence the awful camber, but this is a good pic to show where the steering rack should be ;-)

PHOTO

It will all end about level when I adjust everything properly ;-)

HTH

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
02GF74

posted on 18/1/06 at 09:50 AM Reply With Quote
you've got extensions on as well!
View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
rusty nuts

posted on 18/1/06 at 10:20 AM Reply With Quote
But isn't the Velocity wider?
View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
02GF74

posted on 18/1/06 at 11:52 AM Reply With Quote
sorry, one more Q.

Four M8 bolts will be strong enogh to hold the steering rack in place?

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
muzchap

posted on 18/1/06 at 11:54 AM Reply With Quote
I have got extensions on... You need them with an Escort Rack....???

The Front End of the Luego is a BOOK CHASSIS....

Yup that's what I've got... 4 M8's with washers either side... and some 'threadlock' ;-)

[Edited on 18/1/06 by muzchap]

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
rusty nuts

posted on 18/1/06 at 12:01 PM Reply With Quote
It may be a book chassis but I think you'll find the track is wider unless it uses shortened drive shafts as in the Luego Locost IRS. Wishbones are longer than book?
View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
britishtrident

posted on 18/1/06 at 12:09 PM Reply With Quote
Viewed from above the outer Track rods should be slightly ahead of the rack --- just look at a Sierra, Mk1/2 Escort, Capri, Avenger. The reason for this is it the way cars with rack and pinnion steering get any ackerman angle ie. toe-out on turns.

Putting the rack head of the outer track rod ends will give toe-in on turns leading to poor turn in and very iffy handing.

[Edited on 18/1/06 by britishtrident]

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
02GF74

posted on 18/1/06 at 12:28 PM Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by britishtrident
Viewed from above the outer Track rods should be slightly ahead of the rack --- just look at a Sierra, Mk1/2 Escort, Capri, Avenger. The reason for this is it the way cars with rack and pinnion steering get any ackerman angle ie. toe-out on turns.

[Edited on 18/1/06 by britishtrident]


ok, so moving my rack back is a bonus then!!

So like this when viewed from above:[img][/img]

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
eddymcclements

posted on 18/1/06 at 01:55 PM Reply With Quote
Good stuff on Ackermann here:-

http://www.racecar-engineering.com/images/features/ackermannpt1.pdf

and

http://www.racecar-engineering.com/images/features/ackermannpt2.pdf

and

http://www.racecar-engineering.com/images/features/ackermannpt3.pdf

Cheers,

Eddy

View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
MikeRJ

posted on 18/1/06 at 03:25 PM Reply With Quote
Note that moving the rack will affect bump steer. When using a rack not designed for the chassis and suspension, moving the rack back/forward up/down can tune out most of the bump steer. Just moving it randomly in one direction could make it worse, so I would definately want to be testing bump steer. Removing one of the front shocks and bolting a laser (e.g. laser pointer, or spirit level with built in laser) to the hub seems to be a popular way of doing this as it can be made very sensitive depending on how far you project the laser.
View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
muzchap

posted on 18/1/06 at 07:39 PM Reply With Quote
Rusty Nuts

I said the 'FRONT' of the car is book chassis.

It's just the rear that's wider to accomodate the IRS set-up.

That's what I've been led to believe anyway...

I don't claim to know conclusively, hell I'm just a basic amateur - was just trying to help the guy out with his positioning...

If you look at the luego mount - it's SLOTTED to allow continual adjustment - which is a very good idea

[Edited on 18/1/06 by muzchap]

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
big_wasa

posted on 18/1/06 at 10:15 PM Reply With Quote
Here is mine.

I followed Rortys advice. I fitted all the wishbones/uprights and rack, I tacked the front of the rack mount like a hinge and cycled it repeatedlie moving the rack up and down a small bit at a time untill I got the least deflection (bump steer ) . The rack ended up about 6mm down the mounts compared to the book and about 25mm lower at the back of the mounts more than the drawing in the book.

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
JB
Senior Builder






Posts 436
Registered 20/5/04
Member Is Offline

Photo Archive Go!
Building: Built: V8 Kitten, 2 litre Lada, Space frame Minor,

posted on 19/1/06 at 04:30 PM Reply With Quote
Ackerman

quote:
Originally posted by britishtrident
Viewed from above the outer Track rods should be slightly ahead of the rack --- just look at a Sierra, Mk1/2 Escort, Capri, Avenger. The reason for this is it the way cars with rack and pinnion steering get any ackerman angle ie. toe-out on turns.

Putting the rack head of the outer track rod ends will give toe-in on turns leading to poor turn in and very iffy handing.

[Edited on 18/1/06 by britishtrident]


I always thought that ackerman was determined by the position of the track rod ends in relation to the pivot point of the upright (ie a line drawn through the lower and upper ball joint) The position of the rack forward or backward (so the track rods point either forward or backwards) determines the rate of ackerman during turning.

My advise would be to have the trackrods perpendicular to the centre line of the vehicle and 100% ackerman.

100% ackerman is where a line drawn from the trackrod end, passing through the above mentioned pivot point of the upright coincides with the centre of the rear axle. With a front rack this can be awkward to obtain due to the trackrod and disc getting close.

Carroll Smith has lots of thoughts on ackerman in his books and his ideas actually change with each book.

John

View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
MikeRJ

posted on 19/1/06 at 11:20 PM Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by JB
I always thought that ackerman was determined by the position of the track rod ends in relation to the pivot point of the upright (ie a line drawn through the lower and upper ball joint)


That is true only for systems that have a tie rod directly between the two steering arms, e.g. anything that uses a steering box rather than a rack and pinion. The ball joints on the ends of the tie rods rather spoil the ackerman geometry, positioning the rack so that the tie rods are at an angle with the wheels straight ahead helps to counteract this.

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
britishtrident

posted on 20/1/06 at 11:16 AM Reply With Quote
Yes you only really get true "text book" ackerman on cars that have a centre track rod and idler arms with and old faishioned steering box. As most of the motor mechanics text books are aimed at heavy goods vehicle mechanics it is still version that is taught.

A couple of the less techie kit car companies really haven't a clue about the importance of getting the steering rack position right worse they haven't even he sense to copy the donor in this respect.

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
britishtrident

posted on 20/1/06 at 11:18 AM Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by big_wasa
Here is mine.

I followed Rortys advice. I fitted all the wishbones/uprights and rack, I tacked the front of the rack mount like a hinge and cycled it repeatedlie moving the rack up and down a small bit at a time untill I got the least deflection (bump steer ) . The rack ended up about 6mm down the mounts compared to the book and about 25mm lower at the back of the mounts more than the drawing in the book.



What looks right is right --- and it looks pretty near perfect to me ;-)

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
NS Dev

posted on 20/1/06 at 04:07 PM Reply With Quote
Simple answer, Yep!!!

The advice to swing the wishbones up and down and clock the actual bump steer is the only way to know without drawing it all up.

Rack slightly behind the steering arm pivot ends is "about right".

JB's advice is also correct, the main influence on ackerman is the in-out positioning of the steering arm pivot point on the upright, which is what I adjusted on my grasser to get sensible ackerman with a very short wheelbase. This also allowed me to move the pivot rearwards, shortening the steering arm giving a quicker steering ratio as well.





Retro RWD is the way forward...........automotive fabrication, car restoration, sheetmetal work, engine conversion retro car restoration and tuning

View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member

New Topic New Poll New Reply


go to top






Website design and SEO by Studio Montage

All content © 2001-16 LocostBuilders. Reproduction prohibited
Opinions expressed in public posts are those of the author and do not necessarily represent
the views of other users or any member of the LocostBuilders team.
Running XMB 1.8 Partagium [© 2002 XMB Group] on Apache under CentOS Linux
Founded, built and operated by ChrisW.