Printable Version | Subscribe | Add to Favourites
New Topic New Poll New Reply
Author: Subject: Front Wishbone geometry
amalyos

posted on 4/5/06 at 09:57 PM Reply With Quote
Front Wishbone geometry

Does the geometry look right for my wishbones. I thought the wishbones should be level top and bottom.

What do other RT+s look like?

Steve Rescued attachment Front Wishbones.JPG
Rescued attachment Front Wishbones.JPG

View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
graememk

posted on 4/5/06 at 10:06 PM Reply With Quote
i wasnt very good at geometry at school, is it somewhere near france ?
View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
Avoneer

posted on 4/5/06 at 10:29 PM Reply With Quote
Looks spot on to me.

Top should be angles slightly to keep the wheel vertical when going up and down.

Pat...





No trees were killed in the sending of this message.
However a large number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced.

View User's Profile E-Mail User Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
G.Man

posted on 5/5/06 at 03:45 AM Reply With Quote
Looks perfect to me also







Opinions are like backsides..
Everyone has one, nobody wants to hear it and only other peoples stink!

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
britishtrident

posted on 5/5/06 at 07:04 AM Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by amalyos
Does the geometry look right for my wishbones. I thought the wishbones should be level top and bottom.

What do other RT+s look like?

Steve


Me thinks perhaps you have been looking at F1 cars -- they are a special case as the suspension is rock solid because of the tons of of downforce from the aerodynamics.

Take a look at F1 cars from the mid 1960s such as the Lotus 33 and 49 or Brabhams and that will give you a better idea of standard practice.

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
Syd Bridge

posted on 5/5/06 at 08:45 AM Reply With Quote
[quote
Take a look at F1 cars from the mid 1960s such as the Lotus 33 and 49 or Brabhams and that will give you a better idea of standard practice.


The above may have been 'standard practice' with narrow cross-ply tyres, but...

A much better guide would be the suspension geometry of 80's F1 cars, and even some up to current LeMans cars.

Geometry thinking changed markedly with the introduction of wide flat tyres, and modern tyre constructions.

Have a really good look at the rear geometry on most current F1 and Sports cars, then have a good hard think about what is going on, and moreso, WHY? , with regard to the wide flat tyres and how they operate best.

Cheers,
Syd.

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
Bryce

posted on 5/5/06 at 08:59 AM Reply With Quote
The set-up you have is called “ Unequal length converging wishbones “. The wishbones converge at a point outside the vehicle. Since the wishbone mounts are already fixed the important part is the position and length or your steering rack, this controls bump steer. First of all you need to get the camber right, with the correct amount of camber check the castor. Then adjust your track rod arms to get the correct amount of toe-in. Put the suspension through bump and then droop whilst mapping the toe-in and toe-out of the wheel. If the front wheel moves from toeing-in to toeing-out or the opposite then you have bump steer, usually on the locost its because the rack is positioned to high. Rescued attachment DSC00048.JPG
Rescued attachment DSC00048.JPG

View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
G.Man

posted on 5/5/06 at 09:59 AM Reply With Quote
Its all about camber change...

The lower inner top mounting point will cause more negative camber to be applied as the car rolls to the left (right hand corner) maintaining a flat contact between the tyre and the road..

Dont worry about the theory, get Marc to set your car up once its completed and SVA'd







Opinions are like backsides..
Everyone has one, nobody wants to hear it and only other peoples stink!

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
amalyos

posted on 5/5/06 at 10:15 AM Reply With Quote
Thanks for the comments, it's put my mind at rest.
Now I just need to worry whether the engines a going to run!!!

This project was meant to help releave the stress of work!!!! but I know what I'd rather be doing

Steve

View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
marc n

posted on 10/5/06 at 07:20 AM Reply With Quote
lloks good to me steve , starting to get miffed now everyones car is further ahead than mine, been trying to find time to finish one of mine for the road for two years now





please email rather than u2u
direct workshop email ( manned 8am till 6pm )
www.mnrltd.co.uk enquireys to :-
chrismnrltd@btinternet.com

NOTE:This user is registered as a LocostBuilders trader and may offer commercial services to other users
View User's Profile E-Mail User Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member

New Topic New Poll New Reply


go to top






Website design and SEO by Studio Montage

All content © 2001-16 LocostBuilders. Reproduction prohibited
Opinions expressed in public posts are those of the author and do not necessarily represent
the views of other users or any member of the LocostBuilders team.
Running XMB 1.8 Partagium [© 2002 XMB Group] on Apache under CentOS Linux
Founded, built and operated by ChrisW.