Printable Version | Subscribe | Add to Favourites
New Topic New Poll New Reply
Author: Subject: 160 Mph, ???
stevec

posted on 1/6/06 at 09:42 PM Reply With Quote
160 Mph, ???

Will this really do this speed ?
http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/mk-indy-fireblade_W0QQitemZ4644724688QQcategoryZ29750QQssPageNameZWDVWQQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
muzchap

posted on 1/6/06 at 09:45 PM Reply With Quote
NEVER!!!

It's got the aerodynamicy of an old womans shopping trolley!!!

Theoritically it could probably attain that top speed with the correct gearing - but in reality it just cant...

Happy to be proven incorrect - but my estimation is about 120-130mph top-end...

And no chance with him sitting in it




[Edited on 1/6/06 by muzchap]





------------------------------------
If you believe you're not crazy, whilst everybody is telling you, you are - then they are definitely wrong!
------------------------------------

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
flak monkey

posted on 1/6/06 at 09:45 PM Reply With Quote
Not a chance





Sera

http://www.motosera.com

View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
Deckman001

posted on 1/6/06 at 09:46 PM Reply With Quote
The speedo might say that, but a gatso wouldn't comfirm it Most blade engined Indy's top out at about 130 due to gearing, He might have got round this with a special diff, but a blade lump wouldn't usualy give out the needed umph to go that fast
Nice car though

Jason






View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
stevec

posted on 1/6/06 at 09:46 PM Reply With Quote
Thats what I thought, perhaps a tryping erior.
View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
JoelP

posted on 1/6/06 at 09:47 PM Reply With Quote
dream on!

cant be too light either with a full cage, reverse box and lsd!

350 miles in 2 years seems a terrible shame, i did that in the first week!

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
INDY BIRD

posted on 1/6/06 at 09:47 PM Reply With Quote
i persume that a zonda or ultima is towing it to get to that speed???

Yeh wright!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
joneh

posted on 1/6/06 at 09:48 PM Reply With Quote
Perhaps he has a JATO kit for it?






View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
stevec

posted on 1/6/06 at 09:52 PM Reply With Quote
Perhaps he lives near a cliff.
View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
welderman

posted on 1/6/06 at 09:57 PM Reply With Quote
Have i to take a look at it, it's not far from me.

But i can get over 190 mph on my speedo. Thats why ive got myself a speedo healer now.





Thank's, Joe

I don't stalk people


http://www.locostbuilders.co.uk/forum/23/viewthread.php?tid=172301

Back on with the Fisher Fury R1

View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
ned

posted on 1/6/06 at 10:14 PM Reply With Quote
even with a 3.14 dif i'd be suprised if it could pull that speed even on a rolling road without the aero problems to worry about.

highly unlikely on a rolling road - not a chance on the road.

Ned.





beware, I've got yellow skin

View User's Profile E-Mail User Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
Hellfire

posted on 1/6/06 at 10:20 PM Reply With Quote
Who are you lot trying to kid. Everyone knows the Indy is the most aerodynamic of all the sevens. 160mph........... with a Blade engine? EASY. Ours will do 220mph, the kid next door told me so..................






View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
stevec

posted on 1/6/06 at 10:41 PM Reply With Quote
LOL.
View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
Peteff

posted on 1/6/06 at 11:55 PM Reply With Quote
If it was red

it might be in with a chance, any kid knows red cars are faster.





yours, Pete

I went into the RSPCA office the other day. It was so small you could hardly swing a cat in there.

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
richijenkin

posted on 2/6/06 at 08:38 AM Reply With Quote
Of course they are






View User's Profile E-Mail User Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
carnut

posted on 2/6/06 at 08:53 AM Reply With Quote
I bet it wouldnt do a sub 4 sec 0-60 either!
View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
carnut

posted on 2/6/06 at 08:56 AM Reply With Quote
richijenkin

I love your avatar!

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
wildchild

posted on 2/6/06 at 09:40 AM Reply With Quote
not a chance. even with perfect gear ratios. particularly not from a blade.

that's gut feeling. if anyone can give me a rough guess at drag coeff and frontal area of a seven type car I'll happily work out how much power you would need to get to 160mph.

the 0-60 is vaguely believable.





http://www.wildchild.org.uk
Build photos on Flickr

View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
matt_claydon

posted on 2/6/06 at 09:56 AM Reply With Quote
According to wikipedia, Cd for a caterham is 0.7. And I found a site listing frontal area as 1.47 m^2

I'd guess an MK has more frontal area with a pretty similar Cd.

I'd do the maths myself but in the 11 months since I finished studying Mech Eng I've forgotton everything

View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
matt_claydon

posted on 2/6/06 at 10:06 AM Reply With Quote
Nothing better to do!

Drag = 0.5 * Cd * Area *Air Density * Velocity^2

160mph = 72 m/s

Drag = 0.5 * 0.7 * 1.47 * 1.3 * 72^2

Drag = 3467N

Power = Force * Velocity = 3467 * 72 = 250kW

250kW = 335 BHP

For those who can't be arsed with the formulae and conversion factors, this is what it boils down to for a seven in BHP and MPH. Approximately:

Power Required = 0.00008 * Velocity^3

And

Max Velocity = Cube root of (12500*Power)


Remember this is power at wheels, not engine power.

For my car (137bhp engine) this would give 120mph. I've managed about 105-110 so taking account of drivetrain losses this sounds about right.

[Edited on 2/6/06 by matt_claydon]

View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
wilkingj

posted on 2/6/06 at 10:25 AM Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by JoelP
dream on!

350 miles in 2 years seems a terrible shame, i did that in the first week!


350 miles... I did that just getting to and from the SVA centre

As for 160Mph.. in theory maybe, in reality, no way!.






1. The point of a journey is not to arrive.
2. Never take life seriously. Nobody gets out alive anyway.

Best Regards
Geoff
http://www.v8viento.co.uk

View User's Profile E-Mail User Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
wildchild

posted on 2/6/06 at 11:17 AM Reply With Quote
I make it about 360bhp, but my calc includes a few more losses, such as:

- rolling resistance (I've borrowed values for a daewoo matiz)

- difference between engine test bed power (the 360bhp) and the power it produces under the bonnet with an exhaust on (estimated at 5% loss of power)

- transmission losses (again estimated as 5% loss of power).


pretty highly tuned fireblade engine to put out 400bhp/litre! maybe he could teach some F1 teams how to build engines!


160mph on the rolling road is not the same!

[Edited on 2/6/06 by wildchild]





http://www.wildchild.org.uk
Build photos on Flickr

View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
cossey
Contributor






Posts 430
Registered 5/12/05
Location Kent
Member Is Offline

Photo Archive Go!
Building: a pile of bits that will someday be a fisher fury

posted on 2/6/06 at 11:56 AM Reply With Quote
losses from crank to wheels are about 17-22% probably at the lower end for a bec. so 335rwhp means more like 405bhp at the crank.

and fireblade indy would be nearer to 115mph.

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
dilley

posted on 2/6/06 at 04:47 PM Reply With Quote
youd need at least a busa turbo running 580 at wheels to hit 160, holeshot racing have got one.
View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member

New Topic New Poll New Reply


go to top






Website design and SEO by Studio Montage

All content © 2001-16 LocostBuilders. Reproduction prohibited
Opinions expressed in public posts are those of the author and do not necessarily represent
the views of other users or any member of the LocostBuilders team.
Running XMB 1.8 Partagium [© 2002 XMB Group] on Apache under CentOS Linux
Founded, built and operated by ChrisW.