Printable Version | Subscribe | Add to Favourites
New Topic New Poll New Reply
Author: Subject: Automatic?
caber

posted on 20/7/06 at 08:33 AM Reply With Quote
Automatic?

HAs anyone looked at an auto box for a 7? I was reading about the Chapparall can am cars in the 70s that used torque converters and initially a single speed box and latterly a three speed very successfully because the power to weight ratio was so high they gained more than they lost through using an automatic on lap times.

I was wondering what auto boxes were used on Fords that have the same arrangement as the type 9 box.

TIA

Caber

View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
donut

posted on 20/7/06 at 09:03 AM Reply With Quote
No reason why not although resale value will drop as no one wants an 7 auto (except me!!!!) as people see these cars are racers/sports cars. I have seen 1 auto but the owner was disabled. I think it's a great idea..... but then i like left of center stuff!

Escort Mk2 would be ok with it's 1600cc Xflow.

[Edited on 20/7/06 by donut]





Andy

When I die, I want to go peacefully like my Grandfather did, in his sleep -- not screaming, like the passengers in his car.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/andywest1/

View User's Profile E-Mail User Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
smart51

posted on 20/7/06 at 09:31 AM Reply With Quote
Was there ever a sierra auto? It seems likely. If the sierra auto box fitted in the same place in the sierra as the manual then it doesn't seem unreasonable for the auto to fit in the seven.

The torque converter only idea is interesting. Torque converters have a torque multiplying range of between 2 and 3:1. When it is slipping, it multiples the torque and as it reaches its normal speed, the torque multiplication reduces. If you had a fixed single gear of 15 MPH / 1000 RPM (a bit like 3rd in a manual box) the torque converter would slip to as low as 5 MPH / 1000 RPM or 1st in a manual.

You would pull away in "1st" and gradually slip through "2nd" to you fixed 3rd. You'd have a top speed of 90 at 6000 RPM but the transmission would be very light.

[Edited on 20-7-2006 by smart51]

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
smart51

posted on 20/7/06 at 09:58 AM Reply With Quote
perhaps you could fit an overdrive as well so that you could have two ranges 1st to 3rd and 2nd to 5th.
View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
graememk

posted on 20/7/06 at 10:16 AM Reply With Quote
i was thinking about auto at the start of my build due to lack of room in the footwell for my feet, i bought racing boots insted.

although i see alot of auto cobras around






View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
David Jenkins

posted on 20/7/06 at 10:23 AM Reply With Quote
I don't believe that an auto box is truly in the spirit of a 7-style car, even though I like auto tin-tops.

However, I am a firm believer in people building whatever takes their fancy, so if it fits and appeals to you then go for it!

David






View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
Just

posted on 20/7/06 at 10:26 AM Reply With Quote
There were definitely auto sierras - an entire section for the auto box is covered in the haynes manuals.
View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
Lawnmower

posted on 20/7/06 at 10:41 AM Reply With Quote
My wifes got an auto mk1 Mazda MX5, with an over drive. It got the 1.6 engine, which when coupled with an auto, are made to be more torquey at lower revs, bet less peak power. It nice to drive and fun, but it aint that quick, and will only just beat over cars away from the lights. When I buildi mine, and if i do decide to use an max5 as a donor, I would go for the 1.8 engine couples to the 6 speed box.

Sithcing the OD on or off takes about a second...as does the kick down, shift down. etc. plus you it will change gear sometimes at random when you dont want it too, ie you let off the gas for a corner, and it changes into a taller gear, then you it wont changes back down into the lower gear to pull away. a bit annoying. may just be my driving style.

(would love to supercharge it, but on this car means losing the air con, and SWMBO wont let me)

IMO
to take full advantage of it, you need a more powerfull engine, more torquey at low revs , such as a v8!

or go for a bike engined car with paddle shifters!

[Edited on 20/7/06 by Lawnmower]

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
asn163

posted on 20/7/06 at 11:23 AM Reply With Quote
I know that last year MAC#1 supplied a chassis for use with an autobox, I think that the running gear was from a 1.8 Sierra.

Simon

View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
britishtrident

posted on 20/7/06 at 01:30 PM Reply With Quote
Most automatics are a bit on the wide side because of the sump, however auto boxes have been fitted to MG Midgets and Lotus fitted one on some 70s/80s Elites.

Best source would probably be a Mk1 Escort, Mk1 Capri or Mk 2 Cortina as they use the BW35 box --- very strong, the later Fords used the Ford C3 or C4 boxes which don't take to hard use.
Which ever auto you use you will end up with a massive gap between the gear ratios.

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member

New Topic New Poll New Reply


go to top






Website design and SEO by Studio Montage

All content © 2001-16 LocostBuilders. Reproduction prohibited
Opinions expressed in public posts are those of the author and do not necessarily represent
the views of other users or any member of the LocostBuilders team.
Running XMB 1.8 Partagium [© 2002 XMB Group] on Apache under CentOS Linux
Founded, built and operated by ChrisW.