spanky
|
| posted on 22/2/07 at 08:26 PM |
|
|
rover p5 help
hi a friend of mine has a 1971 v8 rover p5 coupe, does anyone on here know the head settings for one? many thanks 
if this isnt the right site for this kind of question im sorry
[Edited on 22/2/07 by spanky]
[Edited on 22/2/07 by spanky]
|
|
|
|
|
Wadders
|
| posted on 22/2/07 at 08:34 PM |
|
|
Try here M8
http://www.roverp5club.org.uk/
Originally posted by spanky
hi a friend of mine has a 1971 v8 rover p5 coupe, does anyone on here know the head settings for one? many thanks
if this isnt the right site for this kind of question im sorry
[Edited on 22/2/07 by spanky]
[Edited on 22/2/07 by spanky]
|
|
|
macnab
|
| posted on 22/2/07 at 08:35 PM |
|
|
What head settings? Valves, bolt torques?
|
|
|
spanky
|
| posted on 22/2/07 at 08:38 PM |
|
|
the bolt torques.... sorry
|
|
|
miniconverter
|
| posted on 22/2/07 at 08:39 PM |
|
|
Head bolt torque is 90-96 Nm or 66.5-70.9 lb ft
|
|
|
spanky
|
| posted on 22/2/07 at 08:40 PM |
|
|
great thanks ! your an angel xx
|
|
|
02GF74
|
| posted on 22/2/07 at 08:41 PM |
|
|
the question is somewhat lacking in sense.
if it is torque for the head bolts, there is a more up to date sequence that shold be used to avoid warp.
|
|
|
spanky
|
| posted on 22/2/07 at 08:44 PM |
|
|
well i only know what i was told to ask sorry if it appears to be the minimum of info but i am female!
|
|
|
miniconverter
|
| posted on 22/2/07 at 08:55 PM |
|
|
Information is from 2006 autodata and gives no sequence so the assumption is it is tightened in the normal manner. On something this old bearing in
mind when it was last put in a new car it is vary doubtful there is any revised sequence and even if there was tightening in the normal manner
wouldn't cause problems as they didn't suffer with head or head gasket problems
Hope this helps
|
|
|
jollygreengiant
|
| posted on 22/2/07 at 09:47 PM |
|
|
1981 Autodata :-
single stage only 90-96Nm
bolt sequence
5, 4, 1, 2, 3,
10, 9, 6, 7, 8, front
14, 13, 11, 12,
Beware of the Goldfish in the tulip mines. The ONLY defence against them is smoking peanut butter sandwiches.
|
|
|
mark chandler
|
| posted on 23/2/07 at 10:55 AM |
|
|
But you have 4 smaller bolts on these, the longer bolts should be torqued down to 90-96Nm, the short ones 82-85Nm, or 10% less !
In the ideal world get the heads skimmed and use proper head gaskets, not the pants tin ones.
If it was me I would install some later heads from an SD1, bigger valves.
Regards Mark
[Edited on 23/2/07 by mark chandler]
|
|
|
rusty nuts
|
| posted on 23/2/07 at 07:35 PM |
|
|
The P5 originally used a sealant on the head bolts and all bolts tightened to the same torque setting. Rover experts do not tighten the third row of
bolts nearest the exhaust to the same torque as the main bolts , the theory being that the heads "tip" ISTR the torque for these bolts
is half the normal torque . Nice cars if well looked after
|
|
|
Bob C
|
| posted on 23/2/07 at 09:09 PM |
|
|
When I was building up my 4.6 RV8 I got new heads - the bolt holes on the head were missing on that extra row of holes. In other words rover
themselves eventually realised these holes were counter productive & stopped using them. So I'd suggest you could leave the bolts out
entirely, though a gentle 'nip up' might be less of a worry!
Bob
|
|
|
.jpg)
