Printable Version | Subscribe | Add to Favourites
New Topic New Poll New Reply
Author: Subject: Sierra Box
Hammy360

posted on 23/11/10 at 12:28 PM Reply With Quote
Sierra Box

I've just bought a 1990 Ford Sierra as my donor, how do I find out the gearbox type that it has? Also I havent decided between the MK Indy or the Tiger Avon, any thoughts? I'll be ordering my kit this week so your advice is appreciated
View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
flak monkey

posted on 23/11/10 at 12:34 PM Reply With Quote
Reverse position will tell you.

Up and to the left is a type 9

Down and to the right is an MT75.





Sera

http://www.motosera.com

View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
loggyboy

posted on 23/11/10 at 12:55 PM Reply With Quote
Or look underneath to see if the bell housing is integral to the box, (MT75 is integral, type 9 is bolted)
View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
mikeb

posted on 23/11/10 at 02:07 PM Reply With Quote
You could also order a comprehensive kit from saturn based on the haynes roaster, its another option to add to mix and very similar i believe to the MK.
View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
turnipfarmer

posted on 23/11/10 at 02:41 PM Reply With Quote
Check with the kit mfr before committing yourself. There aren't too many chassis will take the MT75 box, but most will handle the type 9
View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
DJT

posted on 23/11/10 at 11:19 PM Reply With Quote
I'm not sure on what donor parts the MK Indy uses, but if you are going Avon (like me), then make sure that you can source all the required donor parts. The gearbox is one of the harder ones - hopefully you've got a type-9. The cortina uprights are getting rare too.

You can see a picture of each gearbox here:


MT75

Type-9

Good luck!

View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
Mix

posted on 23/11/10 at 11:30 PM Reply With Quote
Hi

Just to clarify - the MT75 box pictured in the post above is the 4WD version, the 2WD one does not have the power take off at the rear and is therefore narrower.

Regards Mick

View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member

New Topic New Poll New Reply


go to top






Website design and SEO by Studio Montage

All content © 2001-16 LocostBuilders. Reproduction prohibited
Opinions expressed in public posts are those of the author and do not necessarily represent
the views of other users or any member of the LocostBuilders team.
Running XMB 1.8 Partagium [© 2002 XMB Group] on Apache under CentOS Linux
Founded, built and operated by ChrisW.