Printable Version | Subscribe | Add to Favourites
<<  1    2  >>
New Topic New Poll New Reply
Author: Subject: best throttle bodies
emwmarine

posted on 16/9/12 at 06:31 PM Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by will121
I did have gsxr 600 throttle bodies with standard zetec ecu and ran fine at 150 bhp now have gsxr750 ones fitted with a home made manifold total cost me £100. Now Running with emerald ecu when mapped dave walker did say didn't really like bike bodies but he mapped it all fine and easy with no issues at all, I will admit proper bodies will no doubt be better and possibly more power with better air flow but cost 6 times as much or the the price of a set of performance cams!


Do you get more power with the 750s over the 600s?





Building a Dax Rush.

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
will121

posted on 16/9/12 at 06:49 PM Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by emwmarine
quote:
Originally posted by will121
I did have gsxr 600 throttle bodies with standard zetec ecu and ran fine at 150 bhp now have gsxr750 ones fitted with a home made manifold total cost me £100. Now Running with emerald ecu when mapped dave walker did say didn't really like bike bodies but he mapped it all fine and easy with no issues at all, I will admit proper bodies will no doubt be better and possibly more power with better air flow but cost 6 times as much or the the price of a set of performance cams!


Do you get more power with the 750s over the 600s?


i have no direct comparison as the smaller 600's were running with standard ford ecu, when i fitted the larger 750's also fitted cams and emerald ecu which together gave extra 23bhp (measured on two different RR's so no basis for comparison), basically would expect 750's to ultimately provide more power but think many others have had good results with 600's fitted, think also depends on what other tuning you propose.



View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
beaver34

posted on 16/9/12 at 07:11 PM Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by jeffw
There will be very little difference on WOT between any of the types of throttle body (Bike/Jenvey/ATPower etc) the difference comes on part throttle, especially just off idle.


i agree 100%

ive run busa bodies and now run DTH jenveys

on WOT no difference, but ask the mapper what a ball ache bike bodies are to map, they need proper thorttle quadrant making for them that is suited to a pedal setup rather than a bike grip as its hard to apply a little throttle

and 2.0 neededing 45 i would like to see 45 vs 38 on the same motor, you may make peak power but will sacrifice it elsewhere in the rev range

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
BaileyPerformance

posted on 16/9/12 at 07:50 PM Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by jeffw
Interesting stuff. Was that 5BHP loss across the board or just at peak?


Just peak power, but i'm sure if we moved the injectors outboard we would have gained power over the carbs.

I tuner friend of mine built a full race 2.0L duratec for an autograss car, it made 280BHP at 9K on jenveys. He moved the injectors out (away from the engine) and mounted them on the underside of the throttle bodies, the same engine on the same dyno made 303BHP

We have also done some work with both 2004 and 2008 Hayabusa engines for use on the grass, the 2008 engine (stock) made 195BHP (around standard power) on jenveys with megasquirt but make 140lb/ft tq. (stock tq is around 110lb/ft)

This proves to me that the bike throttle bodies are designed with space restrictions in mind due to the limited space available on the bike. Jenveys win hands down on a car engine and on a bike engine. This is why i think bike throttle bodies should not be used on car engines as they are barely good enough for the bike they came off!!

NOTE:This user is registered as a LocostBuilders trader and may offer commercial services to other users
View User's Profile E-Mail User Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
mtechmatt

posted on 17/9/12 at 08:16 AM Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by BaileyPerformance
quote:
Originally posted by mtechmatt
quote:
Originally posted by BaileyPerformance
quote:
Originally posted by monck
Thats what i did my tb's where about £70 from the US , shipping and other taxes on top of that but still good ..

On a 2.0 blacktop i would recommend 750cc or 1000cc tbs the 600 cc tb's are cheaper as theres less demand i found but ill leave that to you to decide ..


A 2.0L Zetec must have at least 45mm bore throttle bodies, not sure what size the bike ones are? as you say the 750cc or 1000cc will prob be 45mm.


Dale,

Cant really agree with this, I have had 167bhp on 38s...

That was on CV type bike carbs (not injection)...

The ports are smaller than 45mm...

Just my opinion

Matt


Hi Matt,

The zetec inlet ports are not massive, but overall size is close to the flow rate of a 45mm throttle (oval shaped port, about 22mm each valve inlet)

On jenvey 45s you should see no less than 170BHP (we have seen 177BHP) on an otherwise stock blacktop, 190BHP with cams. A decent exhaust manifold and system makes a big difference too.

It would be interesting to do a back to back with 40's verses 45's, but as there is no disadvantage to using 45's on a 2.0L there seems little point in using 40's. On a 1.6 or 1.8 40's mite be better due to better throttle response (air speed would drop with 45's i suspect)

We have seen recently a slight drop in power when we converted a redtop from weber 45's to megasquirt and direct to head jenvey's. Better throttle response with the jenvey's but we lost 5BHP top end. We put this down to the position of the injectors - we know from previous dyno testing most engines respond better if the injectors are further down the inlet tract, and often mounted under the throttle bodies (upside down) also helps power. With the carbs the fuel in introduced to the air stream roughly in the center of the carb body, unlike the jenveys we used that had the injectors in "factory" locations very close to the engine.

Dale.


Dale,

Can conform your theroies on injectorm[placement.

On a rallyx HondaS2000 powered corsa we built, we actually had 2 sets, one near the intake face, and another set futher back. Gives more time for atomisation/swirl at high air speeds/rpm, and anotible kick in the torque curve...

Definately the way to go if ECU/Budget/Fabrrication allows staged injection...

Matt






V4 Engine Management System | Online Shop | Rolling Road Tuning | Motorsport Preparation | Engine Packages | Throttle Bodies

Check out what's happening in the workshop via our Facebook Page:
The Workshop


MEGASQUIRT ROLLING ROAD & BIKE CARB TUNING SPECIALISTS
www.mtechautomotive.co.uk

View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
<<  1    2  >>
New Topic New Poll New Reply


go to top






Website design and SEO by Studio Montage

All content © 2001-16 LocostBuilders. Reproduction prohibited
Opinions expressed in public posts are those of the author and do not necessarily represent
the views of other users or any member of the LocostBuilders team.
Running XMB 1.8 Partagium [© 2002 XMB Group] on Apache under CentOS Linux
Founded, built and operated by ChrisW.